patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Jane Shinozuka: I'll be an Independent Voice for Residents

Ridgewood council candidate running on platform of financial conservatism, opposition to hospital expansion.

 

Jane Shinozuka says her time spent in a wide variety of Ridgewood circles gives her a unique perspective on the expectations of residents and the struggles they face.

Married to a Ridgewood native with three children in the school district, Shinozuka is running for one of three council seats in the May election.

"I have one kid in each level of the school system so it gives me a good view of that end of life in Ridgewood," Shinozuka said in a telephone interview.

The 17-year resident is also an active member of Mt. Carmel Church, serves on her neighborhood association, as well as the Ridgewood Planning Board and has served on the HSA. 

"I've collected experience from very many different aspects of living in Ridgewood, so as a general citizen I think that makes me fairly well informed about what's on people's minds," she said.

Shinozuka believes there's something of a wayward notion Ridgewood is an idyllic community void of any issues.

Though she says it's clear Ridgewood is a nice place to raise a family and very much enjoys living in the village, Shinozuka says she can be a voice for those not living among the Jones'.

"There are lots and lots of very regular people in Ridgewood," Shinozuka, who works in recruiting for an energy company after staying home and raising her children, said.

She too has battled for employment in a tough economy and her husband Rei (who sought an appointment to the school board last year) was also briefly unemployed. Her situation, she said, is not necessarily unique, and because of the downturn residents expect their elected officials to be even more fiscally restrained than ever before.

"I think it's important for us to keep a realistic face on this town," she said. "Not everyone can throw money around or support issues that aren't fiscally prudent, even if they seem a lot of fun. There's a whole voice out there that isn't heard."

To that end, she said she's hoping voters elect her to make the tough decisions. She's not a member of CRR, PGC, RPP, RRV or any other acronym representing a special interest, she said.

"I think I can be a very valuable voice in village government, to be conservative in spending, to plan for the future, to not forgo proper financial planning in the short-term," she said. "I'd like to preserve the good things in Ridgewood and not sit by and watch things fall to the wayside because of impulsive or bad judgment."

Having immersed herself in budget discussions in recent weeks, Shinozuka said she's an unaffiliated, independent vote and feels that should be particularly attractive to voters.

"As a town, we need to progress and go forward, but be very careful in how we go about that. You can't just say yes to the new shiny toy every time –you have to take into consideration the way it affects the people who live here and how it will affect their daily life down the road."

Here's what she had to say about some of the big issues in town:

Graydon Pool

"I would not support a large-scale change to Graydon for many reasons," Shinozuka said, noting it's not clear how many people would even support a change.

But her bigger concern is one that overlaps with more substantive, widespread issues – flooding.

Given Graydon's apex point in the middle of the flood plain, making expensive, large changes might be a fool's errand, she said. "To spend additionally on top of all of it, spending money the town doesn't have for something like that on a pool project seems sort of foolish. No matter what you build there, we'll always be subject to damage by natural causes. I don't know how you can justify upkeep."

The $100,000 annual loss is a "lesser of two evils," she said, concluding that finding new ways to increase badge sales as well as water quality improvements should be top priority.

Storm management

Though Shinozuka, who lives in the side of Ridgewood east of Route 17, wasn't as affected by the 2011 storm cleanups as others, she said it's clearly aroused passion among residents.

"If that is the case, it needs to be taken as seriously as it deserves," she said. "To me that means finding out exactly what went wrong in their [residents'] eyes, finding out what's going on in the town's end and how you improve that."

She said she doesn't right now have all the facts, and if she gets in the position as an elected official she'd look to enact changes.

"Whether or not I have a personal experience with something that goes wrong, I am a firm believer in giving people a voice to people who feel they're not being heard that way," she said.

Workforce

Could the cleanup have been done better? Shinozuka said she'd like to find out given the volume of complaints residents have lobbed at Village Hall.

"My first thought is obviously there are problems if people are complaining about it," she said, identifying the cleanup woes that seemed to start with the Streets Department and wonky calendar. The workers in that department are down from well over 20 members at the peak to around seven today.

"Is it just not appropriately staffed? Can you start an argument going forward when you're not starting with enough [Streets] employees in the first place?" she asked, again noting she'd like the tools at her disposal to dig a little deeper and assess if there are enough workers to attend to the work.

Business District

Another group of complaints the mother of three often hears is the prohibitive nature of the building department, one she said residents believe to be overrun with red tape.

"Revise the system, make it less onerous for people to come here," she suggested. "Considering we're in a tough economy anyway, people say the rents are high to begin with. You're not really begging for business when that happens."

The candidate said she hoped Ridgewood could find a way to attract a greater variety of retail businesses, not just banks and restaurants.

"I think it's back to the drawing board," she said of parking, adding it's a problem for businesses and residents alike. "Any idea is worth considering."

Shinozuka said she'd be interested in looking into use of a garage, which the council in its most recent budget discussions said may be turned into a private-public partnership.

Taxes

"Comparatively speaking, for the prpoerty and the services we do have, Ridgewood is not that much worse than other towns around us," Shinozuka exclaimed. "We're not off the charts statistically."

But the high taxes hurt, she said. "For the time being, we should start looking at leveling them."

Given the budget dichotomy, those who want greater levels of service and also lowered taxes are unlikely to find solace, she conceded.

But Shinozuka said the distributions toward various items in the budget could perhaps be changed. Those on fixed incomes, and those who have lost their jobs are most vulnerable in the economic downturn.

With a bevy of new housing plans under review, Shinozuka said she'd like to see a focus on seniors.

"We owe it to our seniors to find them better housing options to keep them in town," she said. "Give the seniors a viable option to stay in town."

Valley Hospital

"I did not and do not support the plans as presented," Shinozuka said resolutely of the failed Renewal expansion plan. "I think it was too big, cast off the residents in the area and I think it didn't give proper recognition to legitimate worries."

The candidate did remark that it's important to recognize the realities and find a solution that can be accepted by all interested parties.

"Clearly there should be some level of compromise," she said. "Valley as a business is obviously not going to stand still forever, they're going to do something. But it has to be something the town and people in town can live with."

Addressing viewpoints from other candidates (and likely taking a jab at Gwenn Hauck), Shinozuka is not bashful about how big a component she believes Valley to be.

"You see candidates say there are other things that need to be dealt with and that's true, but it's a fundamental issue and concern that is in no way on the back burner as much as other people make it sound," she said.

Shinozuka stated that the residents' best interests should trump those of business and as a council member, her duty would be to work for those residents.

"Who are we here to protect and serve?" she asked. "Are we going to facilitate the hospital to grow and create more business and prosper for themselves or is our job to protect our residents? What's the motivation? At what point do you protect the residents?"

Pedestrian Safety

Remarking she'd like to see continued enforcement, Shinozuka said she'd like to concentrate equally on the preponderance of jaywalkers.

By reducing jaywalking, she thinks the dangers of pedestrian safety would be at least mitigated. It's an issue very personal to her, as her brother was killed by a car.

"Do you want to play a blame game or do you want to keep people alive?" she said rhetorically. "I think we really need to launch a public awareness [campaign] of pedestrian street smarts."

Retroactive raises

Shinozuka believes there are a lot of misinformed opinions on the tongues of residents, and she thinks those in Village Hall and at the council should correct chatter that is inaccurate.

Though she did not directly take a position on whether she felt Gabbert's retroactive raise for 2011 was justified, she thinks much appears beyond what the public seems aware of.

"I think there were conditions of the situation that were not brought to light," she said, noting it's her understanding the raises were promised to Gabbert by a previous council, which put the current members in an awkward spot.

Beyond that, she said: "People are angry you give the union raises and then it's 'no' for non-union people? How do you justify that? Really?"

We've already profiled Albert Pucciarelli and Gwenn Hauck, so make sure to click on the links for more on their views. The election for three seats takes place May 8, with the four year term starting on July 1, 2012. Mayor Keith Killion, Councilman Paul Aronsohn and candidate Russ Forenza round out the field. 

[Editor's note: A previous version erroneously stated members serve three year terms; they serve four-year terms.]

Related Topics: Ridgewood Patch and Ridgewood council elections 2012

maureen

12:59 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Sounds like someone who would be perfect for Village Council ...you've got my vote.

Reply
Comment_arrow

MaroonMom

3:28 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Is this is same Maureen that wrote "the only thing Gabbert deserves is unemployment"?!? I don't see this candidate agreeing with you on that issue at all.

jane shinozuka

7:51 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

For clarification - I want to clear up miscommunication in this article as written by the Patch:

To Frank R. -
My message was not conveyed accurately. I am concerned regarding the controversy about the raises. I have discussed it with many, many residents. I don't know anything more than you know. To the contrary - I am part of the public that doesn't have the details which the council felt justified their decision. Would or could other details change anything? For example, if the previous council did in fact promise anything that affected this council, we should know about it.

My point is this- I believe better communication out of Village Hall and the council will improve understanding of the rationale for their decisions. When people know the all the facts they can launch more informed and effective counter arguments to defend their disapproval and seek action.

As for the last line about union vs. non-union raises, I believe what I tried to express was if you give raises to some employees, it's only logical that the others will expect the same. It's a justifiable argument and one that needs to be anticipated.

Reply

jane shinozuka

8:03 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

to Gwenn Hauck -
Although we've not been formally introduced, please know I wasn't "likely taking a jab at Gwenn Hauck" as this article states. This was an inaccurate inference. My philosophy regarding participation in civic affairs is to refrain from "taking a jab" at anyone. I have no intention or desire to say anything negative about any candidate. Good luck to you in the campaign.

Reply

Luis F Serrano

8:46 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

To Mr. Kleimann,

do you really think it's objective journalism to write such description:

'Though Shinozuka, who lives in the "forgotten" side of Ridgewood east of Route 17 (AKA Burglary City),....'

A bit of an unneeded/inflammatory way to describe folks that call that area home, don't you think?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Marcia Ringel

10:11 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Yes--more facts, less snark, please. Nobody calls any neighborhood in Ridgewood "Burglary City." We are proud of all our neighborhoods and do not appreciate dismissive sarcastic remarks about them. It's also distracting in a complex article.

Gwenn

9:55 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Thanks Mary Jane. That is the Ridgewood spirit! I look forward to meeting you and good luck to you too.
Gwenn H.

Reply

Marcia Ringel

10:01 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Agree on most points re: Graydon. However, the resigned acceptance of a $100,000 annual "loss" is a canard that needs to go away. The figures have been manipulated to incorporate a disproportionate percentage of staff salaries that would be paid whether Graydon was there or not. Profits made by the food concession stand over the years were siphoned directly into the general fund rather than put toward on-site maintenance or other Graydon-related uses. Now that the economy is poorer, Graydon is suddenly expected to pay its own way or make a profit. How much revenue does the Village derive from, say, the fields, which cost a well-concealed fortune to maintain? Do tennis badges pay for full maintenance of the tennis courts? But Ridgewood needs to have these things because people like knowing they're there even if they don't use them all the time.

Graydon is an amenity. It is a partly subsidized historic recreational feature of the town, among the very few enjoyed by residents of all ages. Graydon is a PARK used throughout the year. Graydon is a pleasure to look at for those walking or driving by, the source of endless joy to children both in and not in the day camp, and a place to which realtors have driven house hunters for many decades.

Graydon is not a business and was never treated as such until a few years ago when people needed arguments to alter it.

Weather forecasts are predicting a great summer. Graydon badges go on sale April 1.

End of advertisement.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Just Watching

10:57 am on Thursday, March 29, 2012

"Profits made by the food concession stand over the years were siphoned directly into the general fund"
Join the club... same thing is done to the parking authority and that is why it also is always losing money and will never make a profit.

Comment_arrow

Douglas Cronk

12:08 pm on Thursday, March 29, 2012

All due respect, but Graydon for many years WAS treated like a business to the point where it was organized as a public utility, along with all the hefty State guidelines that dictate the minimum amount of revenue and capital reserves needed. At that point, Graydon was not only turning a healthy profit, IT WAS HELPING FUND OTHER PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS SO OUR TAX DOLLARS DIDN’T HAVE TO. Many town swimming pools are still like this, for example Westfield and Florham Park. Unfortunately, once Graydon membership began declining and the Village remained hesitant to raise badge rates, the Village was forced to unwind the entire utility and bring it back on its books.

While there are certainly a number of Village issues that need to be addressed, it would be nice if Council would think about a long-term plan for how we might be able to return Graydon to that kind of operation one day. With municipal budgets getting tighter, if we have areas that can generate revenue rather than cost taxpayer money, we should be looking at it.

Best of luck to you, Jane. Thankfully, even in challenging times, there are still people willing and able to volunteer their time and energy to support their community.

Marcia Ringel

10:08 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

James, Council members serve for four years, not three. Every two years the Village elects (or re-elects) two, then three, then two, as their four-year terms expire.

Steve Wellinghorst will have served for only about 1 1/2 years because after winning a special election tacked onto the November 2010 general election, he was completing the term of Annie Zusy, who died while in office. Annie was elected at the same time as Mayor Killion and Paul Aronsohn, both of whom are running for reelection. Annie's term would similarly have expired this year. That seat on the Council is now available to other candidates because Councilman Wellinghorst chose not to run for reelection.

Reply

Leave a comment