patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Plans Scrapped for Upscale Restaurant at Historic Vasiloff House

If new owner isn't willing to restore the 1929 property on the corner of Linwood and Paramus avenues, demolition is likely.

 

The chef of New Jersey's most romantic restaurant hoped to construct a large restaurant on a historic property in Ridgewood, Patch reported in July.

But unable to obtain one of Ridgewood's prized liquor licenses – plus facing what would undoubtedly be a lengthy process – multiple sources said Cafe Matisse's Peter Loria decided to halt any development plans at 833 Linwood Avenue, known as the "Vasiloff" house.

Tarvin Real Estate agent Melinda Cronk, the listing agent, confirmed Tuesday that Loria is no longer eyeing the property.

The Rutherford-based chef in fact moved on to Montclair to open a second restaurant. But the township's planning board panned his conceptual design, Baristanet reported.

With a liquor license so elusive in Ridgewood, Cronk doesn't expect Loria to stake out property in the village again.

Still, the "Vasiloff" house remains one of the villlage's most unique properties. The Saddle River runs directly to the west of the property border and the lower portion of the land lies in the flood plain; there are also tennis courts in the rear of the 2.46 acre property.

Although it needs significant TLC, Cronk is hopeful the next owner won't demolish the Tudor-style structure, built in 1929.

"The hope is that, if a residential buyer can’t be found, then possibly a business with the means to take on the restoration" will do so, Cronk said.

Across the street, in Paramus, another historic home is being demolished to create a parking lot for the Alpine Learning Center.

The realtor said there has been interest in the property, which is listed for $990,000.

Related Topics: Peter Loria, Ridgewood Patch, and Vasiloff House

Stephanie in GR

9:45 am on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

This mess with liquor licenses being more rare than finding diamonds in Rridgewood is lame. What is this, 1850? Too bad we couldn't have had a wonderful dining establishment in a renovated historic structure. Maybe now a new owner will destroy the home and put up another bank or nail salon.

Reply
Comment_arrow

kevin Linn

1:18 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Stephanie How many liquor licenses are available in GR and how much are they.

anonymous

9:45 am on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

How come liquor licenses are so difficult to obtain in Ridgewood? If there were more I think we would be able to attract a higher caliber of restaurants.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Donna Evans

1:18 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

The number of liquor licenses in any town in NJ is limited by state law, and is calculated on a per-capita basis in NJ. If you want more licenses in Ridgewood it will either need to become more crowded or state law will need to be changed.

Comment_arrow

kevin Linn

6:42 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

This is from the state website:

The number of licenses to sell alcohol for consumption on a licensed premises (restaurants and bars) and to sell alcohol for off premise consumption (packaged goods) within a municipality is determined based upon the population. A municipality may issue one consumption license for every 3,000 of its population. As to distribution licenses, which allow the sale of alcohol for off premise consumption, a municipality may issue one license for every 7,500 of its population. A municipality is allowed to ban all sales of alcohol within its borders if it so desires.

Comment_arrow

anonymous

9:43 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

As Ridgewood has a population of about 25,000, we can have 8 consumption licenses. I think there are only 4 in use right now, Blend, MacMurphy's, Smith Brothers and Park West. Are there 4 that are being sat on? As for distribution licenses, according to state law we can only have 3, which we have greatly surpassed with Super Cellers, Wine Sellers, Cervino's, Cordially's and Harding's. Were some of those grandfathered in?

Patch_comments_icon

James Kleimann

10:04 am on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Just as a point of clarity, the property is zoned residential. Any business interest would need a variance.

Reply

Moist Cake

10:32 am on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

$990,000.... and.... The Saddle River runs directly to the west of the property border and the lower portion of the land lies in the flood plain and.... it needs TLC. AKA, its a bad investment for 2.46 acers for a restoration.

Bulldoze it and subdivide, its the new ridgewood way.

Maybe ridgewooder can building his chessecake factory there.

Reply

jp1

1:18 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

I always had the impression that a liquor license was based on the population of the town,right or wrong.

Reply
Comment_arrow

News Man

6:42 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

If that is the case, how come Hoboken has so many?

Buying and Selling of Liquor licenses are big business... Perhaps, the Council could investigate this and on how to secure more?

News Man

6:42 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Perhaps, that question could be offered and tonight's Council meeting?

Reply

Aannoomm

6:42 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

From what I understand, a few licenses are being sat on. Held, but not used. Also, there is enough population to release more, but then those that are held would depreciate in value.

Reply
Comment_arrow

jp1

9:43 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Do you know tis to be a fact or is it just rumor?

Mikka H

7:52 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Rocco is sitting on one......i think it's the old brass lamp lic.

Reply

Aannoomm

9:43 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

This could be a easy revenue stream for the village. If it is based on population and several are not being utilized, is the population truly being represented?

Reply

Brian

9:43 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

I think the zoning would be possible especially because Route 17 right there is now going to be commercial property. The investment by that business would have helped develop a difficult, large, property to create something new and exciting instead of 4 new development houses on a culdesak.

The liquor licenses, as we have discussed before, are a disgrace. Some are pocketed and the result is that we have 5 bars in the whole town. Opening up 2-3 more licenses would give us a chance to really upgrade the restaurant scene and to draw more shoppers to town. The whole process could feed on itself to revitalize the downtown shopping district.

It is disappointing that this opportunity wont happen. It would be good for Ridgewood to have a real top notch restaurant. You could even see it being developed as a small inn or something with a top restaurant. A great restaurant could have become a draw that would upgrade the food scene in town, support local farms, etc.

Reply

Mike Deutsch

9:43 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Hey, Ridgewood Council! Buy it with Green Acres Money! Going north on Paramus Road there are only two properties between the Vasilov house and that abandoned house. Buy all four properties, it's mostly flood plain anyway.

Reply

I live here too

10:58 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

What about a time limit for how long one can SIT on a liquor license. This would force the sleeping licenses back into use.

Reply

jp1

11:03 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013

Everyone seems to complain about the lack of a bar in a restaurant, but you can bring your own and there are many good establishments without a liquor license.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian

12:15 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013

It is not so much about wanting to go to a place with liquor, the bigger issue is the quality of restaurants. Restaurants without a bar have a limited profit margin. They charge more for entrees but this small amount does not make up the difference in profit if they were to have a liquor license. This limits the chefs/owners who are willing to invest in a town like Ridgewood.

We have several good restaurants but few, if any, great restaurants.

Leave a comment