patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Valley Hospital Back With New Expansion Plan

Planning board expected to begin hearings on a new master plan amendment request in March after a lawsuit was settled between the board, hospital and an opposition group.

 

Valley Hospital is expected to return to the Ridgewood Planning Board with a new expansion proposal in March after the settlement of a lawsuit a neighborhood opposition group filed against the board and hospital.

In an order of dismissal dated Feb. 14, Superior Court Judge Alexander Carver III called for two planning board hearings per month – with testimony and public comments – on a new expansion proposal beginning on March 11, 2013.

The three parties – the Ridgewood Planning Board, Valley Hospital and Concerned Residents of Ridgewood (CRR) – agreed to set a target for a vote on a new zoning amendment to the Master Plan before the planning board reorganizes in July.

(A PDF copy of Carver's order, obtained by Patch at Bergen County Superior Court, is attached at right.)

The settlement states that all three parties agree that the original Master Plan amendment is no longer valid.

"The objective of our lawsuit was to force this issue back to the planning board," CRR chairman Peter McKenna told Patch Friday night. "We felt the Master Plan amendment that was passed in June of 2010 [by the planning board] was flawed and our lawsuit was intended to remove that from the books and records of Ridgewood."

The Ridgewood hospital's previous expansion plan, dubbed 'Renewal', was passed 6-1 by the planning board, but an accompanying ordinance was unanimously defeated by the previous village council in November 2011. That council found substantive and significant problems with the expansion plan.

'Renewal' called for the hospital to double its square footage while creating single-occupancy-only rooms at a cost of $750 million.

It's unclear what scale the latest proposal will be, though multiple village sources told Patch it is expected to be reduced from the 'Renewal' model, with more uses conducted off-site.

No official plans have yet been submitted to the planning board, Board Secretary Jane Wondergem said Friday. The hospital must submit plans by March 1 if it is to appear on March 11.

Hospital officials and Valley's legal counsel, Charles Collins, could not be reached for comment Friday night.

Testimony previously entered in the arduous three-plus years of planning board hearings won't be entirely wiped out, according to the settlement.

"We've agreed not to rehash some of the issues," McKenna said Friday. "It will be a new process and we hope the new planning board will consider the broader impacts that this kind of expansion; that they'll consider the plan relative to a residential community that the hospital sits in."

Specifically, he said, intensity of use was not fully addressed in the previous hearings. It should be fully vetted by the planning board come springtime, he said.

The news of Valley's imminent return is somewhat surprising.

The planning board just lost two members and is weighing the merits of new zoning that could forever change the character of the village downtown. Four proposed multi-family housing projects have been offered for board consideration.

Planning board Chairman Charles Nalbantian declined comment on the matter until the entire board had discussed the settlement with counsel Gail Price on Feb. 28.

It is, however, a very different board than the one that passed the "H-Zone" amendment in 2010.

"I don't assume they come in with preconceived notions about this. I don't assume anything about them," McKenna said. "I do know they have a lot on their plate right now and they're things that are going to alter the look and feel of Ridgewood for decades to come. It's their perogative to determine what issues they can and can't take on at any point in time."

Should the planning board again vote in favor of a re-zoning to the Master Plan, an ordinance to be voted on by the Ridgewood Village Council would need to be drafted.

Like the planning board, the council also has a different look.

Three of the five sitting council members voted against the amendment in November of 2010.

But there are other interesting dynamics at play.

CRR chafed when Mayor Paul Aronsohn supported Gwenn Hauck and Albert Pucciarelli in the trio's successful spring election. Both Hauck and Pucciarelli have supported expansion efforts.

Pucciarelli, also a member of the planning board, has said he'll recuse himself both as a planning board and council member.

Councilman Tom Riche also voted in favor of the planning board amendment in 2010 but then against the ordinance that followed in 2011.

“Concerned Residents of Ridgewood as an organization, its leadership as individuals do not have an issue with Valley Hospital and we are grateful for their presence in the Village," McKenna said in a news release Saturday. "Our issue is with the massive expansion that was previously proposed and the unintended impacts that an expansion of this size and scale could have on the residential character of the Village we love so much.”

Have a question or news tip? Contact editor James Kleimann at James.Kleimann@patch.com, or find us on Facebook and Twitter. For news straight to your inbox every morning, sign up for our daily newsletter.

Related Topics: Renewal, Ridgewood Patch, Valley Hospital "Renewal", and Valley Hospital expansion

longtimer66

10:49 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013

Excellent job reporting this and posting the order too. Interesting times ahead, no question- no matter what your views on Valley and/or all the other projects currently under consideration.

I hope more of the public will follow the PB part more closely than seemed the case last time. Later on at the Council stage last time, many did, but by then PB had already passed the amendments.

Thx James and Patch for getting the info out and pls keep that going as all this evolves!

Reply

Cathy Benson

10:49 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013

Doesn't every member of the planning board who was not on the planning board at the time need to read through ALL the previous transcripts if those are being used? And all the council transcripts if they are using the council decisions in their deliberations? How is that going to work while they are going through the redevlopement issues? I don't believe this could be done before the first meeting?

Reply

Michael Sedon

2:27 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013

Will it take another three years before valley finally reveals the true size and scope of the total construction being proposed now, like it did last time around? And will the hospital offer up any useful information at all without it having to be painfully extracted over the course of months? Probably not, but I would like to start a pool betting on how many times the nauseating comments from the hospital will include how much valley loves its neighbors throughout this next sideshow. It looks like I'm going to have to clear any Tuesday night plans from my calendar for the next four years.

Reply

Ridgewooder

3:51 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013

The council members and those citizens who opposed the first Valley expansion were stupid selfish NIMBY idiots. WE MUST EXPAND VALLEY. VALLEY IS ONE OF THE CORNERSTONES OF OUR TOWN.

Reply
Comment_arrow

longtimer66

4:19 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013

Sorry, I don't live near Valley and we are from here, family here over half a century. We have supported every other Valley expansion since the 50's but did not support the last plan. We also have donated time and money to Valley over many years.

I think anyone who knows me will tell you I'm far from stupid, selfish, or a" NIMBY idiot.". This is my hometown and I'm for what I feel is in Ridgewood's best interest, all things considered. My opinion of last plan and yours are obviously different, but that doesn't make me (nor all the others who opposed it) any of the things you say above.

It was not the "first" Valley expansion, either. The orig. Valley building (now gone) was where docs now park. Then Phillips (oldest part now) was added, making it a much larger place. Then Bergen was added later, then Cheel.

You're entitled to your opinion, of course. But please don't disparage those who don't agree with you. You might alienate folks like me who may well NOT be against a different Valley plan.

Comment_arrow

Vincent Romeo

12:06 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013

Reply To 'Ridgewooder'.
I'm glad there are not many people with your mentality living here. Our homes would be worthless. It is short-sightedness and ignorance likes yours that causes problems in our world. Why don't you move to Iran ? You would feel at home there.

Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

12:06 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013

First of all, using such negative and ignorant language speaks very poorly of you. And we are not selfish, Valley was selfish in their "we own this town and will do whatever we want" attitude! Ridgewood was here before Valley was built and will be here if it ever decides to move. They don't pay taxes, don't employ the majority of our citizens, etc. Get your facts straight. Ignorance in your case is not bliss.

Comment_arrow

paul smith

11:45 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013

Then move on over to van Dien or Linwood and lecture the "selfish NIMBY idiots" about their selfishness over quality of life, home values, property damage, etc. Come on Woody, show the NIMBYs the error of their ways. By the way, if Valley comes up with a reasonable plan and avoids the secrecy, misleading info and idiotic pr gaffes, maybe something can get done.

Terri Genovese

4:09 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013

Don't think that the two sides of this discussion will ever come close to agreement. Valley will want way more than should be allowed on this property since it is already over built as was established 2 expansions ago by the then planning board that made them take down Kraft in order to get permission to build. This is the only large scale business anywhere in Bergen County that is accessed by 2 lane roads on all sides. The reasons additional building should not be allowed are many. I hope the Planning board has the time to listen this time around.

Reply

Eastside Dad

7:03 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013

The CRR is still around? Where have they been during the last few years? They haven't seemed to have been very concerned about the field lights issues, pedestrian safety issues, and the major construction projects (parking garages and apartments) proposed for the downtown and Oak Street areas. I haven't seen them protesting about any of those, unless I am missing something. The only thing that they ever seem to say anything about is the proposed Valley expansion. Are they only concerned about issues in their neighborhood? Wouldn't a more accurate name be the "Concerned Residents of the Streets Around Valley Hospital"?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Vincent Romeo

12:06 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013

Eastside dad,
The question is; What have you done about it ?

Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

12:06 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013

Actually Eastside Dad. That is not true. In fact, many members, if you read their letters to the editor and Ridgewood Patch, have attended meetings regarding those issues. If you noticed, we were formed before these things became larger and important concerns.

Eastside Dad

12:25 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013

Jeanette - If the organization was formed before those other issues became significant, why has the organization not taken stands on them and lobbied as a group? It seems to only care as an entity about Valley. Individuals may be writing letters and attending meetings about other topics, but the organization as a whole doesn't seem to be focusing on them. I am merely saying that its name should more accurately reflect its single-issue purpose. Call it the "Anti-Valley Expansion Coalition" or the "Valley Neighbors Against Expansion" or something like that.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

6:13 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013

I didn't name the group. But I suspect the reason was to show how seriously concerned we were about the expansion. Also, there aren't enough resources, which includes hiring a lawyer, and which we fund ourselves, to spread ourselves so thin. The reason we care so much about Valley is that, like the new development plans, over expansion will greatly impact Ridgewood permanently. And by the way, it will also affect pedestrian safety near Valley and in town.

Linda McNamara

11:09 pm on Sunday, February 17, 2013

As bad as the development of Steven's Field has been for theneighbors, and I did speak out, it is nothing compared to what the wrong Valley expansion could be for all of us. I was just getting geared up to go to a Safety Committee Meeting because of the traffic condition at Linwood and Van Dien that allows vehicles to make a right turn when the light is red. It makes the crosswalk so dangerous especially for BF children. Also, the stop sign at Northern Parkway and Irving is too far back from the intersection and many people don't see it. Maybe we can fix these situations but we are in for another battle if we are to keep Valley in check. Master Plan changes are serious.

Reply

Rose Boniello

11:34 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

It is so very tiring to hear the name-calling by people who feel no one is allowed to disagree with them. I am pretty sure that is called bullying in schools -- and what a horrible example to be setting for your own kids.

What has frustrated me most about the Valley Renewal project is that people do not seem to understand one very major issue -- Valley is not just looking for an approval to expand. They pretty much want Ridgewood to alter the Master Plan to say, Go ahead Valley - you may do anything you deem fit for your hospital. NO ONE - business or individual - should ever get that kind of power!

Has anyone supporting the expansion considered that in order to dig a bigger underground garage, the soil within a 10 BLOCK RADIUS would have to be drained so that there would be no risk of it collapsing! Go on over to Valley and walk/drive for 10 blocks in any direction and try to take that in!! No one can predict the consequences of that.

And the people who have opposed the expansion have not said No to any expansion -- just this one, with its major, major impact on the town! We all treasure Valley, and agree that it is valuable. But it is a 1st rate hospital TODAY, AS IS!! And let's not forget Valley's bullying methods in trying to shut down Pascack Hospital. If Valley maintains there are too many beds in Bergen county, then they should renovate it and convert to all single rooms, and lessen the overall number of hospital beds in Bergen.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

12:15 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Rose everything you have said about name-calling and bullying is true. It's hard to remain civil when falsehoods are bandied about as truths. And bullies believe anonymity gives them the right to spew garbage.

What you have said about he project has been true. The problem is that people refuse to understand our concerns and choose to ignore or are ignorant of the facts.

You are also right about the underground garage, which would disturb the water table and definitely impact neighboring houses. After all the storm damage I can't imagine what other damage to the trees and homes would occur when another major storm will occur, and it will.

We want an normal expansion, not one that will destroy the neighboring real estate values, endanger BF, etc. By the way, most people don't know that last time Valley wanted a major expansion, they encroached on some of BF's fields and they wanted to put an underground garage under some of the playing field. This would've given strangers coming to the hospital, access to our BF students and would've had car exhaust being vented through the astroturf where the children would be seriously affected.

Eastside Dad

1:20 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

Rose - The only reason why the new garage was put underground was because the expansion's opponents objected to the original above-ground design. If the hospital was allowed to build an above-ground garage, then the soil issues wouldn't be such a big deal. Also, your suggestion about going to all single-patient rooms in the current footprint makes no sense, because it would sharply reduce revenues (cut in-patient revenues in half) and cause the hospital to lose large amounts of money.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

12:15 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

The reason it was put partially underground, if I remember correctly, is because can you imagine the visual impact a huge parking structure would have on the neighborhood? And the reason for the single rooms, was mentioned over and over by Valley as being a necessity because of government rules which supposedly state that, if you do a massive renovation whereby you knock down buildings and start from scratch! And most hospitals make money now by outpatients services and surgeries! Or surgeries with one night stays. There are rarely surgeries today that include long term stays.

longtimer66

2:46 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

There's another aspect about all single patient rooms which came up last time but many overlooked it. Most health plans cover only semi-private room unless there is a valid medical necessity for a private room.

I've read that some facilities waive the differential if they have no semi-private room avail and accept what insurance pays (semi-priv)-- but that is up to them and they can change that.

With Medicare, there are some def. guidelines I found on this which in some respects are diff from what is in my small biz' (for example) current policy. Our policy specifically says semi-private only unless there's a provable med necessity. .

Medicare however seems to allow private under some specific circumstances, but what I read also makes a distinction between private and "deluxe" private. What they seem to call "deluxe" did not look all that high-end to me, though I'm no expert on that kinda stuff.

Bottom line though seems to be for many patients, insurance pays for semi-private and if a facility won't adjust the cost due to only having private rooms, the patient can be hit with an upcharge for the difference.

Many in my family (and me, too) have been Valley patients over the decades we've been here, and I sure agree priv rooms are pref for many reasons.

But if most plans only pay semi-private, isn't that a problem?- espec for those who don't have "Cadillac" type coverage? Maybe someone w/ insurance. expertise could weigh in on this?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

12:15 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

That was brought up many times to Valley and it was typically ignored. That will become a bigger problem when Obamacare comes into play, which I believe is 2014. I doubt Obamacare will pay for that and insurance companies keep increasing their premiums for the same or less services. So talking about losing money, why doesn't Valley concentrate on their diagnostic services and outpatient surgeries, which are truly becoming our future. How many people do you know who have had long term hospital stays? It is becoming rare and rarer.

Elizabeth Cox

4:02 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

when you purchased your house next to Valley, what were you expecting? Valley need to upgrade. because if it doesn't and God forbid you need something they don't have because they couldn't expand you will be the first ones to yell & scream-

Reply
Comment_arrow

paul smith

5:38 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

Do you think the plan they had put forward was fine as is? Did you see the impact estimates in terms of foundation damage, traffic disruption etc.? Why no hint of compromise until the 11th hour? They need to modernize but not an expansion that would damage homes in a large radius as well as the little detail of a middle school next door. A compromise plan can be had but the tone deaf approach, hiding of details and the misleading pr stunts showed an arrogance towards the residents in the immediate area. Upgrade, absolutely, massive expansion, no way.

Comment_arrow

longtimer66

12:15 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

For rb- Sorry, but your logic seems flawed. I was against last Valley Plan and we don't live near it. So were many others not near the site. My family's been here almost as long as Valley has, and supported every other expansion plan --but not the last one. So those opposing last plan were not only "next to Valley".

To me, last plan was too much for both the site and for Ridgewood. Only a small percentage of Valley's patients are from here, yet we were going to be saddled with many by-products of that plan, which also seemed wrong -espec. when you consider they pay zero in prop taxes (new Pascack IS paying taxes, btw).

A new, more modest plan might be OK with me-- the devil's in the details . Fine to be the host community, but within reason and respecting this is a built-up town that is mainly residential, unlike some others nearby. That and schools are what attract many people here in 1st place.

But not fine to burden Village with even more costs, more infrastructure probs, signif more traffic and other "side effects" that will be lasting ones I think. We are already at nosebleed taxes as it is.

Most want Valley to upgrade and stay excellent- me too. But last plan involved more than that. Fact is Valley gets top ratings right now, and many services are handled off site-- look at Luckow, also dialysis center in F/Lawn, etc. So, that works.

Upgrade/modernize the Linwood campus sensibly- but not a huge regional center on that site.

Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

12:15 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

I can't speak for anyone else, but I am not next to Valley, I am a couple of blocks away, and yet I will be affected. After their last renovation, they openly lied and said there would be no more major renovations. And what about the students from BF and Travell and the neighbors who moved to Ridgewood NOT because they were across the street from Valley, I know I didn't! They moved here because they wanted to live in a small town, a village, not a city! And if we had not stopped Valley, and if those 4 developments being contemplated were built, what do you think Ridgewood would look like? Not a safe place to raise a family. That's why most of us moved here.

Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

12:15 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

You are right Paul, and if he had seen the plans, unless he worked for Valley, he couldn't agree in good conscience agree to it. The majority of people who want this development either have a connection to Valley, or have major health needs and are only concerned about their own health and those who have ignored the situation from the very beginning. As far as tone deaf, Valley was never honest, tone deaf, and did nothing until they realized they were losing! These are the kind of people you want to trust with our town?

Linda McNamara

5:38 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

What did Valley expect with a limited amount of space, smack dab in the middle of a community with a school as it's closest neighbor? Significnt expansion needs to take place off campus while allowing relevant upgrades at the main campus.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

12:15 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Linda, they were so arrogant they truly believed that they would get what they wanted, with no opposition. They were wrong. Because of CRR they have had to go back to the drawing board. And now, I'm hoping because of the proposed developments, more people will take a second look and realize that doubling Valley would be a huge mistake.

RB

5:57 pm on Monday, February 18, 2013

Ridgewooder....you're showing your ignorance. Get your facts. rb Have you tried fitting into a pair of shoes two sizes smaller than what you actually are? Or, me putting my RB into your rb? Valley's original expansion plan was to put a facility way too big for the space. Never mind whether you purchased a house next to a hospital nonsense. BTW Valley was out there on Feb. 12 conducting a traffic survey. On that day a lot of people were off, including Village Hall being closed. I think the traffic count for that day is a "little off."

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

12:15 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

RB I especially love the traffic experts, for Valley and a proposed development off of Paramus Road. Both times, the "experts", paid for by the groups, did surveys when traffic was lighter, as in August! And even one for Valley and one of the develompent's traffic "experts" admitted that we had major traffic problems that have to be fixed. Try driving on Franklin Ave. after 11:00 AM during the week, never mind on the weekend. And this is a problem now, even before traffic will be increased. How many more accidents, and actual deaths do we have to have before people pay attention? One accident is one too many and we've had way more than that in the last few years.

delgado

12:15 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Again it terrible Bergen Republican politics has now infested the decision making of Ridgewood. One must be fully aware of the large campaign contribtuions that are being received by the Bergen County Executive from one Ridgewood Councilmember Honorable Walsh. It is documented on the offical state NJ ELEC website. This conflict added by the large amount of politial contributions from members of the Valley Hospital Community makes this very large expansion a done deal. This is sad but true.

Reply

megan Smith

12:15 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

IF the Nimby's would go away(move away) this project could be half way through to completion. So much time has been lost-

Reply
Comment_arrow

paul smith

11:53 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Are you kidding? Why don't YOU move away? Do you expect residents to pack up like the Joad family and move on? If something outrageous is approved, hits to housing prices will not be limited to the immediate area but will have a contagion effect. Lower prices= lower assessments= lower collections (or raised assessment rates). Not to mention the potential damage to home foundations over a considerable area and resulting litigation- the original plan was too large.

Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

1:24 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Megan I don't know what planet you come from, but getting rid of the good neighbors right now, will bring in transient renters. That is what has happened to other hospitals that are NOT sided on three sides by residents. Do you want us to become the town of Hackensack? I would rethink your statement. And by the way would be curious where you live and how you would be not affected or affected by the doubling of Valley Hospital.

Linda McNamara

2:36 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

The hospital already is in our backyard. We want to make sure it doesn't drive us out of our backyards!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

1:24 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

As I have said before, this is Ridgewood, NOT Valleywood. We were here first, and I hope we remain so. I would like to stay here as long as feasibly possible and it won't happen if Valley doubles in size.

Rose Day

11:53 am on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Why isn't this over? Doesn't NO mean NO?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

1:24 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Not when you are single-mindedly arrogant and have a lot of money, from revenue and major contributions to back you up.

megan Smith

2:53 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

I can walk to Valley from my house- can't see it with a McMansion blocking my view. I moved here 53 yrs ago .
Why not put up a stink on the projects planned for downtown??Stop them !! The town is too congested already. How many more pedestrians will be run down ?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

11:22 pm on Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Actually, I'm pretty sure I am not the only person who doesn't want the developments. So far they have not had many meetings that I know of. I plan on attending the next public one, when I hear of it. It wasn't very well publicized because I missed it. And it's only in the beginning stages with meetings. I agree about the pedestrians being run down. After what I've seen while driving in town, I expect more people to be hit. And letting Valley double in size will definitely affect pedestrian safety because of the increased traffic. Keeping the streets around the schools safe is just as important.

Interested Resident

11:08 am on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Can we start by clarifying some things....Valley Hospital was built where it was because it was built by the people of Ridgewood. It was created BY them for THEIR town. It is not like some big corporation moved into YOUR town and took over. New folks seem to forget this fact. Some people want it here and want it to be the best place possible to care for themselves and their families!! Also, Valley Hospital does employ many people from Ridgewood and it also serves many residents! Would you feel better if more residents got sick just so the #'s could go up??
Another important fact many seem to forget is that Valley staff members pump a lot of money into Ridgewood. Why don't you speak to our local merchants and ask them how many Valley employees shop, eat/drink at their establishments. Not only do their employees support local residences but the tax money those businesses create helps sustain the town.
One more fact that seems to be consistently & conveniently forgotten by the concerned (for themselves) residents... Valley's design for private rooms is to meet federal requirements based on HIPAA (medical info privacy) laws. You sign paperwork for these laws every time you go to a Dr or pharmacy now. How can your privacy by protected in a hospital if you have a roommate (and their family/friends) on the other side of a curtain!
This constant back and forth is tiring and a waste of money on both sides! Time to get together and make some compromises on both sides.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Michael Sedon

12:06 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

During the last round it was revealed that about 6 percent of Valley's patients are from Ridgewood the rest are from all over. So hardly "many residents." Also Ridgewood was incorporated in 1894. Valley was build in the middle of a residential neighborhood about 60 years later. I'd say the neighborhood was there first. From the 1950's the hospital has slowly grown into a giant corporation that is over taking the neighborhood that it moved into. Maybe the original builders of the hospital meant for it to remain a small community hospital, maybe they were short sighted. Either way the current site is overbuilt. Sorry to say, but sometimes those pesky facts get in the way of a good story.

Comment_arrow

paul smith

12:30 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Like you say, there needs to be compromises on BOTH sides- In the last go-round Valley was not budging on size and scale, the 11th hour theatrics showed that clearly. I don't think anyone is saying do nothing. There needs to be upgrades that will include some expansion but it needs to be reasonable.

Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

1:46 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Get your facts straight. When they built the hospital in the 1950's they did not envision Ridgewood or the Hospital to grow to this size. Also, a very small percentage of residents work at Valley and a small percentage use Valley, except for the ER. We checked the facts out years ago. And Valley has many volunteers, which my daughter was one of, and they solicit money from them all the time. The only reason employees spend any money was because it was a directive from the Hospital. How do they spend money? They work here go home, unless they live in Ridgewood. They only have to have private rooms, if they knock buildings down. Not if they do renovations. Get your facts straight! We were willing to make compromises, from the very beginning Valley refused to because they assumed they would win.

Comment_arrow

longtimer66

3:14 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

For Interested Resident: Ridgewood's pop has not grown that much since Valley has been here. The last big developments in town were done in the 50s. Using 1960 as a baseline, when pop was 25,391, it has not changed much.

What HAS grown is the population of many surrounding towns that the majority of Valley's patients come from. source for old figures here:
http://lwd.dol.state.nj.us/labor/lpa/census/1990/poptrd6.htm
for more current figures here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ridgewood,_New_Jersey

Compare that to some surrounding towns over same time periods. Again, big majority of patients come from other towns, espec after Pascack was closed.

Also, fact is that HIPAA regs do NOT require private rooms, you can find a lot of info on that online. And per testimony from the last go-round on all this, NJ regs also do not require all private rooms for existing hospitals. See this link:
http://www.northjersey.com/news/96709089_Valley_Hospital_states_its_case_for_expansion.html

I'm not against private rooms, btw. But fact is that most insur. plans only pay for semi-private rooms unless there is a med necessity for private. See my other post above for questions on that, too.

Another fact is that property taxes are what supports the local govt and services, not much else. Valley does not pay any. By the way, new Pascack IS going to pay prop taxes to its host community.

Yeah, let's clarify some things, but pls get the facts right.

Andrew J

11:12 am on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Jeanette,
Thank you for keeping us posted and for the work your group is doing. Please post on how others can get involved as well. In conversations and interactions around town, I hear a lot of people complaining but few willing to actually do anything about it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

1:46 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Thank you Andrew for saying that. What we need is money. Unlike Valley, we have no wealthy contributors and we have been paying for a lawyer for quite some time from the money we raise from our members. People only complain after something is accomplished and it's too late to do anything about it. Our website is stopvalley.com. We can use donations and you can see what's going on and sign up for emails.

Interested Resident

5:56 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Are you ppl kidding? You don't know that sales tax from local shops brings money back into the community?? It not only keeps businesses open, some of the local sales tax is given back to the community.Try speaking to the ppl always during you to shop local- they'll help explain it. Valley employees are often supporting our businesses. You are fooling yourselves if you don't believe that.
Also, when you speak of most of the patients being from outside Ridgewood, you fail to see that it also brings more business to your merchants or hotels.
**You don't have to make private rooms in existing places but IF you are building new hospital space you are expected to create private rooms...and I think that is a good, actually, great thing! I have spent weeks in hospitals caring for seriously ill older family members...semi-private rooms with roommates & their visitors are not in the best interest of patients! If you don't understand that- good for you, it means you are lucky enough not to have watch as many loved ones suffer as I have. Having to do so made me understand the importance of quality care and a modern well-equipped facility. That is why I back Valley.
BTW- As for the 6% of Valley patients being from Ridgewood- you failed to provide what % of Ridgewood ppl use Valley. That would be a more telling statistic.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

7:12 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

How do you know that the patients are visiting Ridgewood to shop? Where are your statistics? Plus, the reality is NOT that we don't want single patient rooms, but what insurance company is going to pay for them? Valley will become a hospital for the rich if that were to come to fruition. Plus we have plenty of other people coming here to shop and eat in our restaurants. Do you actually believe that by coming to Valley they would automatically come to our downtown? And what hotels are you talking about? We have NO hotels in Ridgewood. So that statement makes no sense! And I have seen patients have to share rooms, but the reality is that good medical care is much more important that single rooms! Because you keep ignoring the fact, that the majority of patients do not stay more than a day or so. And as medical personnel have told me, the last place you want to be when you are sick is in a hospital! Single patient rooms don't prevent medical mistakes, and poor medical care and germs being spread. I don't remember the exact amount, but I know it's in the single digits, which is not good for a town our size.

Comment_arrow

longtimer66

7:16 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

"Interested Resident" - pls read material at this link:
www.ridgewoodnj.net/pdf/Assmt/SG-Prop_Taxes.pdf

One quote from it, but pls read whole thing: (quote)
Among States that collect sales, income and property taxes, only in New Jersey do property tax collections exceed sales and income tax collections, combined. In New Jersey, property taxes account for about 98% of all locally collected revenues.
(end )

I didn't say I'm against private rooms, quite the opposite. My mom died in a semi priv. room at Valley. I can tell you many stories of suffering. But if most insurance only pays for semi-priv, isn't that a problem? See earlier post in this thread.

I'm not against Valley modernizing. Again, my family is here a long time and supported every other Valley expansion since the 1950s, but not last plan. We have also donated to Valley and been patients there.

But upgrade and modernize in a way appropriate both to the site and also to the Village. Many Valley services are now done off campus - and that works. I'm not against Valley, but was against last plan because I'm concerned with the Village's best interest. Valley is def part of that, but the last plan -- at least to me - was not.

your last point
Pop size of Village has not chngd much since 60s, but Valley has grown much bigger during same time, both svcs and beds. I like that, but more for the site like last plan sought seems too much for Vill to me.

Comment_arrow

Michael Sedon

10:58 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

I must have missed the grand opening, but can you please tell me where the Ridgewood Hotel is that is raking in all this money from out of town patients?

Jeanette L

5:56 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Longtimer66 is correct that there is a big overflow from all the patients who used to go to Pascack Valley, which by the way, has always paid taxes to Westwood and Hackensack will do so also. Just go to Valley's ER. I have heard horror stories about Valley being overcrowded in the ER, for surgery, etc. over the last few years. And once Pascack Valley reopens this year, Valley will not be overcrowded and have a need to expand as much. People also don't realize that patients come from New York State, and other areas and that Valley has advertised in the NY Times and on the radio. Why do they need to have patients come from far away? To make money. I understand that people don't want Valley to close. None of us wants that, but this is a new world of medicine, and Valley has to learn to adapt and also they had the chance to purchase Pascack Valley, which they declined to do so, and then this would not be an issue. And as far as needing single patient rooms, that has been the mantra and reason for the over-development from Valley Hospital, not CRR. And the wave of the future is outpatient testing and surgery. So having satellites to handle those services is going on now and they can certainly find more areas nearby to assign certain services.

Reply

longtimer66

5:56 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

FYI for those who've commented on no one envisioning growth of Rwd back when Valley orig. built- which was in early 50s.:

Actually, pop size of Village has changed little since 1960 - by then most of the larger developments had been built. My family's here since the 50s.

All of Valley was orig a now-gone bldg on Linwood where docs park now. Later, curr oldest building (Philips) was added.

That greatly increased Valley's footprint. There was a Cerebral Palsy center on part of Valley site too. And Kurth Cottage was still a cottage.

Bergen part was built later and then expanded. Also Cheel was built, the part closest to what is now BF. .Back then the part of BF nearest Valley was Travell for K-4. For 5-6 Travell Annex was used, which was where Travell's field is now. It was baby boom and most classes in town had 30 or more kids. BF was 7-9 and RHS 10-12.

Valley was founded partly by some local docs - many practiced at Columbia in NYC. Quite a few had secondary practices in this area too, and so wanted a hosp for local patients.

Also involved in Valley's start were other locals like J Robert Stout , also Citizens 1st Nat Bank, which was at site on Rwd Ave currently talked about as poss arts center. That was its HQ until moving to Glen Rock, selling to Natwest, then Fleet, then Bank of Amer.

So, from 1960, Ridgewood didn't really grow so much, though Valley did - and so did many nearby towns. Thought maybe the history might help some readers.

Reply

Interested Resident

7:42 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Why would ppl travel to get to Valley? Because many other hospitals are awful! We paid approx $800 to move my Dad from Nyack Hosp to Valley. He was receiving terrible care there over 3 weeks and was consistently mis diagnosed! 2 hours at Valley and they figured out exactly what was wrong! Brought another elderly relative there from Brooklyn because hospitals near her were just plain scary and filthy! It's sad so many ppl in Ridgewood don't know how fortunate they are to have Valley.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

9:11 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Actually re: Brooklyn, there are excellent hospitals in NYC. No need to come here, regarding the other hospitals, good for your relatives. But what you have illustrated is what many of you people refuse to acknowledge, Valley is fine the way it is! It doesn't need to expand and what about Pascack Valley? It would have been closer to Nyack but because Valley and other hospitals tried to keep it closed, your Dad had to travel farther to get good care!

Comment_arrow

Robin Giordano

11:05 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

absolutely! Too much entitlement and not enough gratitude.

Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

11:48 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

Robin, on who's part are you saying that? The residents of Ridgewood or Valley, because if you mean the residents you would be wrong. We love having Valley the size it is in Ridgewood! We just don't want a behemoth structure near a school and residents. If you mean Valley, you would be right. They feel whatever they need we should accept what they want to do and be happy with it.

Interested Resident

10:01 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

Sorry- Pascack Valley was absolutely not closer than Valley. Not even close! As for Pascack Valley, after the poor treatment my Uncle received there and the malpractice they committed...and the fraud they tried to carry out to cover it up...we wouldn't go there if it was the last place on Earth. P.S.- there may be some good hosptials in Bklyn, but they are not all that great..and they are often filthy and unsafe. Perhaps, you need to spend some time in the real world to see what other hospitals are really like. Valley is better than many...but, it won't be for long if they don't keep up with the times. Will Rogers had a famous quote- "Even if you are on the right track, you will get run over if you don't keep moving."

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

12:32 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

NYC means Manhattan too. World class hospitals and Pascack Valley is being renovated. It will not be the same place because Hackensack is connected and they have a great reputation. And it is closer. I know where Nyack is, because it's near where my daughter goes to school in Orangeburgh, NY, so Pascack is on the way before Valley. Actually I know people who have been in hospitals in Manhattan and maybe you need to spend time in the real world, because you don't know the difference between NYC and Brooklyn. Valley doesn't need to improve because it's a great hospital, it's proof you haven't been there recently, I have for tests and other friends for surgery. And re: Will Rogers and if you keep moving you can go over a cliff if you don't watch where you are going!

longtimer66

10:01 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

Many docs who use Valley also practice at Col Presby and/or other hospitals in NYC. In fact, Valley itself is affiliated with Columbia currently.

Many docs do not practice ONLY at Vailley either. Lots of them are also affiliated with Hackensack (HUMC) and others. Valley often talks about "its" doctors, but most of them do not work for Valley, they work for themselves or their own corporations etc.

My wife needed very specialized surgery just over a year ago. In the end it was done at Valley, but the surgeon, (who heads that dept at Valley), also offered the choice of another hospital. . He advised it handled more cases of the procedure she needed and on that score, might be a great choice.

Remember, that was coming from the surgeon who would be doing it - head of that dept at Valley. He is affiliated with several hospitals. He said he has done this procedure at Valley, but left the choice to us.

We opted for Valley, and felt she received very good care there,from the Valley team who assisted and also the doctor.

As others have noted, Valley first tried to buy Pascack to keep it closed, then fought it being re-opened. They got a big boost in revenue when Pascack closed, and wanted to protect that. But for years, the 2 co-existed quite well and many docs practiced from both hospitals.

Most want Valley to stay excellent and be able to upgrade. But in keeping with the site and with Ridgewood, not like last plan.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

12:32 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

You are right longtimer66. I had one friend who was treated by an oncologist and surgeon who came from Columbia and got excellent care. I also know someone who had brain surgery recently for cancer and got great care but was referred to Hackensack by her Valley surgeon for radiation and chemo treatment. I think what Valley needs to do is accept what they are good at, and expand those areas and understand and accept their weaknesses and concede that patients can receive better treatment in those areas somewhere else.

RdgwdGRock

3:54 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

blah blah blah. so many opinions based on zip. the new expansion proposal will be put forward next month. let the belly aching begin then.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

5:08 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

You are right. A some opinions are based on ignorance, however many are based on fact. The problem is knowing the difference.

disgusted

10:56 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

One fact you cannot get away from Valley hospital does not pay property tax on the hospital you can claim all you want about other propertys but that hospital is a drain on the services and infrastucture of the village. To make the hospital bigger will further test village resources. The equates to increased cost's to all the tax payers in the village not just the one who live near valley.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

4:15 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

And there are two schools nearby, BF and Travell that will be affected if they get the right to DOUBLE in size. All you have to do is walk or drive by Valley and just imagine it being twice the size it is right now. That is untenable and a frightening thought. No longer would it be part of the neighbor, it would take over the neighborhood.

Comment_arrow

Long Time Resident

4:40 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

Ok I accept your arguement about Valley being a drain on the services and infrastucture of the village. So tell me if that was/is such a concern to you why when you moved to Ridgeowwd did you buy a home in a town with such a drain on the communities services? Just wondering.

Lisa Fitzmaurice

12:13 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

Has anyone thought of a Village without Valley Hospital? I have lived here for 20 years and have been very, very happy to have Valley here. Due to its 2 mile proximity to my home, it saved my husbands life. I grew up in another town that had a hospital that had to leave due to no funding and no room for expansion. Some of my family members still live in that town but now have to rely on either Clara Maass in Belleville or St. Michael's in Newark if they have a life threatening emergency. They are well aware that they will not make to either of these hospitals alive if something, God forbid should happen. So, a life without Valley would mean--Hackensack Hospital--that is a nightmare and you have to pay to park if you can find a spot at all OR any other hospital you so choose. So, I would think real hard before suggesting Valley pick up stakes and leave. Been in that situation and believe me when you need to be at hospital ASAP, nice to know Valley is there.

Reply
Comment_arrow

AMAMOM

7:07 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

HUMC is on the forefront of medical technology, a leader on the East coast, so no I don't have a problem going to HUMC. If they were as bad as you say then Valley would not consider them competition. Let's keep to the subject and not throw stones at competition in order to make Valley look better - poor argument and reflects more on you than it does on HUMC.

And an aside, you have to pay to park at Sloane Kettering too - would you choose Valley over Sloan Kettering for cancer treatment simply because you didn't want to pay for parking- silly!

Comment_arrow

Lisa Fitzmaurice

12:47 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

AMAMOM
U did not really focus on question in my post. Imagine ridgewood without valley when that bad chest pain happens and that strange pain down your left arm. And uh oh no local hospital to get rushed to, so now the ambulance has to take you 8 miles away to Hackensack versus what could have been 2 or less. Been in this situation, and I choose local hospital closeby that saved a loved ones life. Also, as to the cancer remark and paying for parking, etc. Valley has top oncologists on staff, I know firsthand since Dr. Yingpruksaywan saved someone near and dear to me, and by the way Valley also has on staff one of the best cardiologists team as well. Would I pay for parking if I thought that facility could do any better than Valley, of course but that was just one of the many things I like about valley. U have to reread my post. And answer the question "imagine ridgewood without valley". And although I usually do not retaliate with nasty comments, nor do I invalidate someone's point of view, ur silly comment was not nice since u did not even answer the real question. By the way, I also have been in Hackensack many times and I never said it was a bad hospital, u did by pitting one against the other. I just said the parking situation is a nightmare, and u can go broke having to pay for parking at a hospital that u nay have a loved one at for let's say 3 mos in intensive care. Been there too. Do the math at $5 a day at Clara Maass.

Comment_arrow

Bill Connor

11:05 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

the Team there Saved My father in Law asrecently as 4 years Ago In a drive up they came out and rushed him into the ER and performed a Miracle .My wife and I will always remember those Kind Proactive Professionals at Valley.We were 4 blocks away on walthery and needed Critical Help.Agree Valley is a very Valuable resource.

Jeanette L

4:09 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

I don't know anyone personally who wants Valley to leave, however, I don't know anyone who wants to live in Hackensack. You are correct about Hackensack Hospital, however, if you drive down Summit Ave., you can see how many houses are now doctor's offices and how much traffic there is near the hospital. Valley Hospital will survive if it compromises. In March we will see how far Valley is willing to live cooperatively with its neighbors, which is Ridgewood.

Reply

Ron Verdicchio

5:04 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

I would think that if Valley vacated the Ridgewood site( which is unlikey since Ridgewood is a brand) the parent of Hackensack University Medical Center will be ready to pounce. Hackensack University Medical Center, Ridgewood Campus.

Reply

Eastside Dad

6:25 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

People keep using the argument about Valley being a big drain on village resources, but no one ever puts numbers behind it. Frankly, I believe that it is a bogus argument. Valley pays for its own water, sewer and trash removal. They shovel ther own sidewalks and cut their own grass. What village services are they using? Police and Fire? Police may go there once a week or so, but how much does that really cost? 1 officer spending 2 hours per week at Valley at $50 per hour = $5200/year. Peanuts. How often does the fire department go there for fires? We would pay them anyways for sitting at the station, so there is no incremental cost. Tell me how Valley is a big drain? I have never seen anyone post any real numbers.

Reply

disgusted

7:35 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

To long time resident I was born in valley, my parents moved here in 1956 I was born in 1958 raised here and have watched valley grow from a community hospital and become a medical center far too big for the neighborhood it is in. So to answer your question I'v been here long before valley became the monstrosity it is now.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Long Time Resident

10:08 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

So now disgusted, after Valley has added to its facility over the years, and you have lived here all those years NOW you have come to the startling conclusion that Valley is a drain on the on the communities services? Really?

disgusted

12:47 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

No not now but prior to the 1st expansion there was never a venue to voice our displeasure like the internet. Secondly what difference does it make when I come to the realization that valley is a drain on village resources, it's certainly none of your buisness MYOB.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Long Time Resident

1:18 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

If I recall correctly disgusted, You directed your comment to me telling me about your parents moving to Ridgewood in 1956 and you were born in Valley Hospital in 1958 and how you watched Valley grow and become "too big for the neighborhood".

See your post above.

All of which is totally irrelevant to the topic. But you take exception to my asking when you came to the conclusion that Valley was a drain on the community and you say that is none of my business. Strange, very strange. Thou protest too much me thinks!

Lisa Fitzmaurice

12:47 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Amom--u obviously misread my post or just chose to ignore the meaning of it. Scenario---severe pain in chest and down left arm, possibly having a heart attack. Which hospital will u tell ambulance to take u to? The one that is local and is a great hospital with an excellent cardiac team of dr's, some even on staff at Columbia or any other hospital further away? I have no problem with Hackensack hospital, been there several times, but my first choice is valley if life threatening situation occurring. As far as cancer treatment and Sloan, again I would pay any amt of money if there was some hope from any institution, BUT that hope also comes from Valley since their top oncologist Dr. Ying did a great job of saving a person very dear to me. So, again I ask same question. "Imagine a RIdgewood without Valley"?

Reply
Comment_arrow

paul smith

2:55 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

There will not be a Ridgewood without Valley. Besides the excellent quality of the staff and track record in general, as well as it's use of generous grants for noble purposes, one of Valley's selling points is it's Ridgewood address, which they do play up. Hopefully they come up with a reasonable plan. They bought the whole strip on the east side of Maple where Village ford and maple cleaners were located. Maybe they're expanding their satellite network.

Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

5:58 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

Paul I hope you are right about them expanding on Maple Ave. That location is more conducive because right now, there really isn't anything in those locations except empty buildings and there is ample parking for patients. And they can build the kind of building that will work best for them depending on what they would put there instead of having to renovate an existing building.

Comment_arrow

Marla Sherman

12:35 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Lisa, why is it that only Ridgewood residents are entitled to a hospital 2 minutes from their home? Valley didn't care that the residents of Harrington Park, Old Tappan and Norwood wanted a hospital in THEIR community. In fact, Valley spent millions trying to stop those people from having that same privilege. Hmmmmm....

longtimer66

2:40 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

To me imagining Rwd w/o Valley isn't a relevant question, since I don't see it leaving. I think most people want Valley to upgrade and modernize, and I agree. If they ever left, I have no doubt another hosp would want the site.

The question is finding appropriate balance between Valley's desire to expand Rwd site and what is suitable for the Village- one which keeps qual of life here as it is -- a big factor in why many choose to live here. With less than 10% of patients coming frm Village, balance is impt.

Last plan - at least to me-- tipped the balance against overall best interests of Village. Let's see what the next one consists of - again devil's in the details. I don't live near Valley, and we supported every other Valley expansion - but not last plan.

The satellite approach seems to work. Look at Paramus site, also others on Franklin Tpk, Rt 17, F/Lawn etc.

The Dr. Yieng a poster refers to shows in Valley directory as based at Paramus site, though I'm sure he also uses the Rwd campus. He's also affiliated with Chilton Hosp , has an office near Duck Pond too.

Recently a friend had a stroke at home in HHK. Life threatening. They insisted ambulance go to HUMC, not Valley. They'd had too many probs with the ER at Valley in past. My family has seen some ER problems there too.

I hope improving ER triaging/access is part of any new plan. Many other functions can be offsite-- as they've been doing. Why doesn't that work- they do it now?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian

4:02 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

The first half of this post is right on. Lets see the plan before deciding we don't like it. It is counterproductive to just say "no."

The parking garage the last time is a perfect example. The hospital can't win. People complain about parking. They suggest building an above-ground garage. Residents complain about the above-ground garage being ugly. So they propose a more expensive underground garage. Residents complain about the impact on the water table. Each of these issues is understandable but you have to help find a compromise. There needs to be more parking (even if they don't expand the hospital). Now how do we make that happen with minimal impact on the neighbors?

Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

5:58 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

Longtimer66 you are right and beautifully said. Of course they can do it! They chose not to go offsite in a bigger way. Since they did lose, they will have to do something in that vein. And you are right about the ER. I have heard stories from other people of very long waits, because they are so crowded. One patient told an ex-employee that he had waited 13 hours. That is not acceptable. I believe that will lessen when Pascack Valley reopens and they take the overflow of patients back.

Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

5:58 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

Brian, re: the garage. Why don't they have a parking lot in a different location for employees and pay for a shuttle bus to get them to the hospital? That's what they would have to do if they were allowed to rebuild on the scale they were planning to. That wouldn't have to be that big a parking lot either.

Ron Verdicchio

4:02 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

Is Valley paying property taxes on the former
Village Ford property?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

5:58 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

Good question Ron. They may not be because they are considered a non-profit, and that is a tiny part of the hospital. They have a, I believe, a free clinic, or low-paying one, and that is the only part that would be considered non-profit. They don't accept Medicaid or the NJ insurance plan for indigent families with children. I forgot what it's called.

Comment_arrow

longtimer66

7:29 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

Valley does pay prop taxes on many of its non-hosp properties in Ridgewood. You can see the numbers at this link (public record) which is also accessible from Rwd web site:
https://wipp.edmundsassoc.com/Wipp0251/

On that screen, enter "Society" then hit search and a list will come up -- both residential and commercial properties. That's because the legal name is Society of the Valley Hospital. The residential properties it owns will come up as c/o Gilsenan, who apparently manages them for Valley.

Mr. Gilsenan was one of the folks who spoke on Valley's behalf during the Council hearings, though I don't think he mentioned that connection.

Currently at same lookup site, the former Vill Ford property shows as being owned by an acquisition corporation whose address is c/o a legal firm.

I agree with many others though that Valley should be paying some form of PILOT or other fees for the hospital property to Village, though it does not do so presently.
Tiger Team report seemed to concur with that too.

Pascack WILL be paying prop taxes to its host town. I don't know if HUMC makes PILOT payments to Hackensack or not for that campus though. Also don't know if Valley makes any payments to Paramus for its sites there (Luckow, Kraft, etc).

Ellie Gruber

12:10 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Before there are any more comments, all of us must read this weeks issue of Time magazine, "Bitter Pill" is the front cover; the report takes up the entire issue. It covers such items as the myth of non profit hospitals, the markups, the need to expand, expand, expand, buying doctors' practices. The article, which takes up the whole magazine is eye opening. Lets talk proven facts, the billing is out of sight, the hospital does not care about zoning restrictions, It matters not what neighbors think. This article is called the "Silent Spring" of health care; it is factual, it will change the way we all look at our costs and the justifications used for expansion and the need for more equipment and single beds.

Read the story, either in print or online before we go forward with any discussions about "needs" of hospitals for better health care.

Reply
Comment_arrow

paul smith

12:34 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

I read the article. It's an indictment on the system as is. The corruption of greed that infests the industry via lobbyists and their concubine public servants is unreal. Administrators earning more than physicians is particularly galling, but that's the way of our nation these days.

Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

5:52 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Thank you so much Ellie for the info. on the Time's hospital issue! Audrey Meyers must be hyperventilating and praying that Ridgewood residents don't read it. I have already posted the link on Facebook and will be emailing the link to my friends. I have read a few pages already, but I am so angry and it becomes mind-numbing to read it all at once. But I will keep going at it. I agree that only all of the posters should read it, but all of America should read it too. It is beyond eyeopening.

John A. Unglert

12:47 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

I am from Wyckoff. Lived here all my life. And I am no where near sure where I would stand on this. In one respect I am for some expansion and changes at Valley. In another I am against such a huge expansion. I am somewhat against the single bed room idea. I spent 2 months in B301, a private room and went bonkers since most of the time I was not able to walk around. This occured twice in 1 year, along with a number of other stays of a week. I am for the semi-private since I was an orthopedic patient the company is good. I can the see other side, moving and ortho bed around is NOT an easy thing to do.

Then I go back to the early 50' s when my first broken arm was treated in the Phillips wing which was the only wing at the time. I wonder how much Valley regrets giving half of the property to the school board ?

And I don't live nearby. So I never see or hear the traffic. Nor am I subject to the construction traffic. In that case though I ahve to say, "you knew what you were buying when you made the purchase." Not unlike buy a home at the end of a runway and then complaining. All hospitals must grow and evolve. They change. BUT maybe Ridgewood does not need a huge complex ? Well, maybe we all need to wait and see what is proposed.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

5:52 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Read the article John and your views will change.

Linda McNamara

2:22 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Thank you Ellie for the recommendation. Quite an article and so relevant. I think it was Dsniel Patrick Moynihan who said," You are entitled to your opinion but not your own facts." To Mr. Unglert, I have had the same reaction during hospital stays. I like the semi private room. Lying in bed can get pretty boring without the interaction of another patient. Maybe I just lucked out. All were pleasant and they motivated me to get out of there as soon as possible!

Reply

longtimer66

3:26 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Excellent article and glad she brought it up. I'm about halfway through reading it online and will read the rest ASAP.

There are many points in the Time piece that are hugely relevant to Valley, I'd say, and haven't even read it all yet. Great find and timely too!

Reply

RdgwdGRock

4:11 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

c'mon folks, you can get this up to 100 comments. reading these posts is like the colonoscopy I was given at Valley

Reply
Comment_arrow

paul smith

4:57 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Hopefully you didn't suffer brain damage. Wait until the plan comes out. The patch will be on overload.The equivalent of at least 3 colonoscopies.

RdgwdGRock

9:42 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

paul smith - nope, wouldn't want to suffer your type of trauma

Reply

Gloria Johnson

10:08 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013

The Time Magazine article is a real eye opener. I wonder what Valley's chargemaster list would tell us and what the salaries are in this non tax paying, "non profit" organization..

Reply

disgusted

11:27 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013

It's't about time ( no pun intended ) the media of any type brought this to light. I belive far too many of our politicians of all levels are too deeply invested in the healtcare industry to take a stand against it. Especially with regards to it's non-profit status.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

6:22 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Exactly. What people don't understand is that Valley is a drain because it pays NO real estate taxes in this town. Pascack Valley paid taxes to Westwood before it closed, and it will pay at least a million dollars to the town when it reopens. Wonder how that money could help this town if Valley paid us taxes. I suspect it would help our school system a great deal so we wouldn't have to cut programs. But that's the last thing Valley really wants to do, is help our kids. Years ago they wanted to put an underground garage under playing fields. Wonder where the carbon monoxide would be vented to. And they suggested that our children cross No. Van Dien to the other side opposite BF when the dump trucks and other vehicles would enter and leave the driveways the children cross now to get to school. Instead of finding a safer way for our kids to get to school. Or to cross the driveways.

Lisa Fitzmaurice

12:17 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

To Marla Sherman,
The people in Ridgewood are not entitled to anything. We pay big bucks in taxes to live here, AND pay tons and tons in health insurance to go to Valley. But, I have lived here for 20 years with Valley 2 miles away from my home, and I thank God for the proximity to my home and Valley. Thank you for your comment though, you validated mine by pointing out your loss of your local hospital and the impact it had on those towns nearest to Pascack Valley, i.e. what do you do now that your hospital closed and how far are you willing to travel and hope you make it alive. Thank you again for your comment, you did mine a great service to this blog. Also, what was the reason Pascack closed its doors? I cannot remember, but I seem to recall could not afford to stay open. But I may be wrong.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

6:18 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

We pay big buck to live here because the school system is funded by our taxes! Get your facts straight. What Marla was saying what makes us feel that we deserve to have our hospital, and that the towns surrounding Pascack Valley don't deserve to have it reopen. Valley and Englewood, among others, tried to prevent that from happening. And Marla is NOT advocating closing Valley. That's the bogus attitude Valley and supporters are trying to pass off as scare tactics so to allow Valley to do what they want. And Pascack Valley closed its doors because of mismanagement involving the overpriced renovations that Pascack Valley undertook before they closed. Got that info. from attending meetings in Washington Township. Could happen here too. And you are wrong about that fact. Maybe you should attend meetings like I did for 4 years so that you could get the real facts.

Lisa Fitzmaurice

9:46 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Wow, Jeanette. You are very passionate about this issue,and for that I applaud you. However, mismanagement of overpriced renovations means in laymans terms, they did not have the funds to stay open. And, I am well aware of where my taxes r going, having put 2 children thru our school system---so my facts r all in tact. That word entitlement, is not nice since the luxury of great school system and local hospital comes with a price that not everyone in Bergen county is willing to undertake

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

11:26 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Once again you are wrong Lisa! The facts are that they overspent on renovations! I got that from Westwood officials at a meeting in Westwood. Maybe if you had bothered to attend meetings you would actually know what's going on! And I am passionate because of the outright arrogance, and strong arm tactics of Valley in trying to get what they want. And because of the ignorance of so many residents to what is happening to our town.

Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

11:26 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

And entitlement is an assumption that something is deserved for an elite few. The reality is that the residents of this town pay enough in property taxes, and by the way, did you know that houses have gone down in value in this town? That was in the Ridgewood News and that assessments on certain houses have gone down. So let's let Valley double in size, add 4 developments and then lets see what the new price of living here will be and who be willing to pay it. My feeling is that you wouldn't like the changes and the new residents better than what we have now.

Eastside Dad

10:17 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Jeannette's comments about Valley being a drain are incorrect. She may be passionate, but that doesn't make her accurate. Valley pays taxes on properties that it owns around the town, even if it doesn't pay PILOT on the hospital property. It also pays for its utilities, including water, sewer and trash disposal. If you are going to argue against the hospital expansion, at least use facts that are correct.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

11:26 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Really? What properties around town? Do you even have one fact to tell you how much Valley owes this town in taxes if they actually paid them? It's a considerable amount of money. And our town could use it. Our schools have continually had to cut programs, look at the tree service, where we have to outsource maintenance, etc.

Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

11:26 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

And it's much more than what they pay for utilities!

Lisa Fitzmaurice

11:48 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Jeanette, u r a little behind on ur fact checking so it seems. RE post on feb 25 about Valley and employee parking. Their employees do have to park at the facility behind Fairway (Cheel)?in Paramus and catch the shuttle that Valley provides to the hospital on VanDien. Have a relative that works their, so I know this first hand. It sounds like u really are not a fan of Valley, so why on earth would u go there for a test, to visit or anything at all for that matter? As u state many other great hospitals at least 15 to 20 miles away, possible sit in traffic for an hour, pay that lovely bridge toll $12? and then pay to park too. Have at it. I love valley and the convenience and quality of care it gives, end of story.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

12:04 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Lisa I am not a fan of ignorance, greed, arrogance, strong arming and fake PR. However, that is the administration, if you knew your facts, we are not attacking the staff. They are not the problem. They don't make the decision. The board and the administration make the final decisions. And like many ignorant people, you believe everything Valley says, and you seem to keep ignoring the fact, that we don't want it to move. The truth is don't want it to double!

Comment_arrow

Jeanette L

12:04 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013

And if you knew anything, this only started because of the overflow of traffic from Pascack Valley's patients and because Valley was preparing for the renovation they assumed they would be allowed to do.

Lisa Fitzmaurice

12:23 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Jeannette, all of ur arguments were credible until u called me stupid and ignorant. Neither of which I am. But, all my points have been said and some people agreed with me but because of ur rude remarks I will say no more because I don't care to converse with people that resort to bad behavior or bullying to get their way.

Reply

Jeanette L

11:22 am on Saturday, March 2, 2013

Ignorant of the facts, yes. I did not call you stupid. Funny you saw it that way. Ignorance is not knowing the facts, not being stupid. I am not a bully but I am sick and tired of people who don't make themselves aware of what is going on in their town and then proceed to have an opinion. I sat through years of meetings and made myself informed, before I came to a decision. I sat through two different renovations, one in the 90's and the last one. You made assumptions about me before about my feelings for Valley that I found insulting. That is hypocritical and unfounded. That's what is so wrong about people in this town. Not wanting to know the whole story and only seeing one side. And after more than 4 years everyone in this town should have figured out what the truth was instead of still being in the dark.

Reply

Leave a comment