patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices

Village Should Take Walk of Shame

I want to apologize to the woman speeding through up Ridgewood Ave. and turning on to Broad Street. I refused to back out of the  crosswalk so you wouldn’t have to stop. And, like many drivers, you must believe that streets are only for cars and that pedestrians have an obligation to keep out of your way. 

You were shocked that I didn't step back to the curb so you could pass, but instead kept walking through the crosswalk.  

Bad me.

Let's face it, the traffic situation in the central business district is so bad that, as [former Ridgewood News Staff Writer] Michael Sedon reported, when the police staged a crackdown they had to cancel it because they couldn't keep up with the violations!

Bad police decision.

We need to do something about the CBD scary traffic problems. And the steps are pretty simple.

Enforce the traffic laws. (The fines will more than pay for the extra police work.)

Put a stoplight at Ridgewood and Walnut. (I know the secret oath every Village council member has to take says, "I will never approve of a light in the CBD on Ridgewood Ave".)

But enough is enough. We need it and there is no reason not to have it. 

We could and should go further. 

  • Set a 15 MPH speed limit on Ridgewood Ave. 
  • One way traffic.  Diagonal parking. 
  • Good policy. 

All these changes–which wouldn't cost us a dime and actually would make us money which could be used to lower taxes–are easy to make.

Why won't the council act? Why wouldn't the 27 or so councils before act?

Why can't we have a light on Ridgewood Ave in the CBD?

Why can't we limit speed, direction, and allow more parking?

Maybe we need a “Occupy Ridgewood” chapter.

But, seriously, we all can agree that we need changes now. 

We can all agree that the chief saying he can't afford downtown enforcement is wrong. We can't NOT afford downtown traffic law enforcement.

The time for action is now before someone else gets hurt or even killed just trying to cross the street without apoligizing.  

Shame on the village for not acting now!

Ellen Simpson

4:17 pm on Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Minimum $1000 speeding fines with a ticketing blitz. Done.

Reply

Harlan Consider

8:23 pm on Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Looks like half the Police Dept. was keeping tabs on the illegal massage parlor.

Reply

kerry

2:12 pm on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Two days ago, I was leaving Stop and Shop and turned onto Franklin Ave heading east and stopped for a father and two very small children to cross the street in the crosswalk. They walked out into the street and stopped in front of my car half way across Franklin Avenue. Multiple drivers coming in the opposite direction would not stop to let them finish crossing the street! The man actually threw his jacket up and out into the street to see if they would stop and the cars ran over his jacket! He did this twice. It was outrageous. Those children could easily have been hit and killed.

Reply

Bill Connor

4:42 pm on Wednesday, October 12, 2011

At some Point- corners like Stop and Shop cars making the left towards Kings might have to also be Prohibited making any Left turns to remove the Risk of even more current chaos at that Broken Intersection with Cars turning every which way- too much going on there. Speeding and non- Yielding to crosswalkss aside.

Reply

Dan Gergoslow

2:20 pm on Friday, October 14, 2011

Dan Johnson you have absolutely NO IDEA of what you're talking about. The woman was not "Speeding through Ridegewood." Rather she was at a stop sign turning left onto Franklin St. As a witness to the aftermath of the event I can tell you that she didn't see him while making the turn. You make it sound as though she went out of her way to run down the pedestrian. Where do you get off making such accusations?

While your other suggestions might merit discussion, your insulting introduction makes anything else you had to say mute. This woman isn't public enemy number one and you have no right adding to her torment. Grow up.

Reply
Comment_arrow

RdgwdGRock

2:34 pm on Friday, October 14, 2011

Dan Gergoslow - Dan Johnson was probably writing about a personal experience of his, not the traffic accident you are referring to. Please refine your cognitive and reading skills.

Dan Gergoslow

2:45 pm on Friday, October 14, 2011

No,he wrote about that specific incident. "I want to apologize to the woman speeding through up Ridgewood Ave. and turning on to Broad Street. I refused to back out of the crosswalk so you wouldn’t have to stop. And, like many drivers, you must believe that streets are only for cars and that pedestrians have an obligation to keep out of your way.

You were shocked that I didn't step back to the curb so you could pass, but instead kept walking through the crosswalk.

Bad me."

That sounds like a rather specific incident. An incident in which he was not involved in. He was taking a cheap shot in an attempt o make a point. I'm not the one who needs to refine my cognitive and reading skills.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe

6:43 pm on Friday, October 14, 2011

Yo Dan Gergoslow, Dan Johnson clearly was writing about a first person incident that happened to him, thus all the "I refused..." and "I didn't step..."

Anger management = look into it.

Comment_arrow

Dan Gergoslow

11:45 pm on Friday, October 14, 2011

SInce I can't post directly to Joe I'll post here. The image in Dan's blog post was from an incident in which I was somewhat involved. By posting the picture of a man getting medical attention while lying on the street yet knowing the man in the picture could not have been Dan (I know the man in the picture), the posting came across as sarcastic, deceptive and insensitive.

If he's commenting on his own situation (which he says he is and I have no reason to doubt him) then he should not have used the image. Angry? You bet I was and am angry to look at the picture for Dan's blog post, know the people involved and know no malice was intended by the driver and having deep concern for the victim. Since the event in the picture took place quite near the area Dan described I took the post as mocking the driver while also claiming to be the man on the ground.

You bet it's personal to me.

Dan Johnson

4:48 pm on Friday, October 14, 2011

Here is the opening of my blog post as you can see I am referring to a car that almost hit me not to some other incident:

I want to apologize to the woman speeding through up Ridgewood Ave. and turning on to Broad Street. I refused to back out of the crosswalk so you wouldn’t have to stop

Reply

Ellen

5:55 pm on Friday, October 14, 2011

As long as we refer to our town as the "Village of Ridgewood," we are in denial that it is actually quite a metropolis, with the hustle and bustle of a thriving downtown - good news for the few merchants who are still in business, but bad news for pedestrians, who are forced to stick their necks out into crosswalks and hope for the best. Just about every time I stop for someone on foot, the folks behind me honk and make rude gestures, before they attempt to swerve around me. They wouldn't shout at a red light. One way streets, diagonal parking, a parking garage, and stop lights - not quaint, I grant you, but necessary safety measures in 2012's Ridgewood.

Reply

Dan Gergoslow

6:14 pm on Friday, October 14, 2011

Yet the picture from the post is from the accident two weeks ago of the minivan turning onto Franklin that had top creep through the intersection in order to attempt a left hand turn. If that's not the incident you're referencing, why is that the image on the post?

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

James Kleimann

6:29 pm on Friday, October 14, 2011

Mr. Gergoslow,

The blog post written by Mr. Johnson explores a variety of his grievances regarding pedestrian safety, not specifically his experience referred to in this comment thread. The photo, which is clearly captioned to reflect a different incident, is representative of some of the larger pedestrian safety issues. To my knowledge, Mr. Johnson did not have a camera while he was attempting to cross the street.

Joe

6:46 pm on Friday, October 14, 2011

I'm not saying your ideas (one way Ridgewood Ave, diagonal parking, etc.) aren't worth looking into, but don't pretend they "won't cost a dime." Of course there will need to be signage, street painting, etc. Also, I'm curious what the traffic changes will do to other streets...the domino effect. So probably some sort of traffic consultant will be needed. All worthy things to explore, but not free.

Reply

Dave

10:59 pm on Friday, October 14, 2011

It doesn't take a genius to see what is wrong. Pedestrians now feel they have the right away. They do not wait for it to be safe before stepping into the crosswalk. They step right off the curb into the crosswalk and expect the cars to stop no matter their speed or distance from them. Too many times they step off the curb without even looking in the direction of the oncoming traffic or making eye contact with a driver. The pedestrian law needs to be repealed or tickets should be given to pedestrians who step into the crosswalk when it isn't clear. If you have driven Ridgewood Ave. and haven't noticed this you are a poor driver.

Reply
Comment_arrow

martay

4:15 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

Hey, folks. I grew up in Ridgewood and now live in California. CA law states that pedestrians have the right-of-way. Drivers must wait until the crosswalk is clear. They can be cited and fined if they do not wait. Since I never experienced such courtesy while in the NY-NJ area, I assumed, (as does Dave) that it was the other way around in NJ. However, this is NOT SO!

Allow me to quote from the NJ Motor Vehicle Commission website:
(http://www.nj.gov/mvc/About/safety_pedestrain.htm)

"In most cases, pedestrians have the right-of-way at all intersections.
A motorist must stop and remain stopped for a pedestrian who is crossing at a crosswalk (marked or unmarked) until the pedestrian completes his/her crossing. Motorists who fail to yield to pedestrians or who overtake and pass vehicles that are stopped for pedestrians are subject to a $100 fine and up to 15 days in jail (N.J.S.A. 39:4-36)."

So, you see... The answer is simple. DRIVERS MUST OBEY THE LAW.

Comment_arrow

Dan Gergoslow

11:20 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

Martay,

In other news, water is wet and there are 60 seconds in a minute. My snarky comment demonstrates undisputed facts with no room for ambiguity.

However, when it comes to pedestrians in crosswalks there is a tremendous difference between someone cavalierly driving through crosswwalks regardless of the presence of pedestrians and drivers moving through crosswalks and being unable to see someone in the crosswalk until it's too late.

It might be that a driver is distracted and it might be that a pedestrian jumps out in front of a moving vehicle at the last moment and the driver is unable to stop in time.

That's why we differentiate between accidents and indifference.

Comment_arrow

Patricia F.

11:31 am on Tuesday, November 1, 2011

The eye contact comment is moronic. I once made "eye contact" while crossing a street and the driver still managed to do a right on red right over my two children in a jogging stroller. I had to pound on the hood to pull my kids out from under this guy, jogging stroller destroyed, kids nearly killed. Guy floored it, cursed at me and took off, to the shock of me and the other pedestrians and drivers who saw it. Driver haste and arrogance are the problem. NOT pedestrians.

Jeanette L

8:43 pm on Sunday, October 16, 2011

I agree that pedestrians often disregard the law, Dave, but they don't stand much of a chance if they are struck. And they are not the whole problem. I have seen cars turning when people are crossing the street in the crosswalk, and the cars are so impatient that they are literally turning about a foot away from the pedestrians because God forbid they have to wait a few seconds. And I agree that the pedestrians cross expecting you to see them. That happened to me when an older man was crossing Linwwood Ave. as soon as I was turning right into the crosswalk. He apparently didn't see me at all, and if he had waited at the corner, I would've known he was there and waited for him. He jumped right around my car as I was turning, so he definitely didn't see me. I was just so glad that I didn't hit him, and it's made me ten times more aware than I already am. However, this means it doesn't just have to be in the middle of town, it can happen at any crosswalk. I think we need more enforcement from the police and large fines until people get the idea.

Reply
Comment_arrow

martay

4:21 pm on Friday, October 21, 2011

Allow me to quote from the NJ Motor Vehicle Commission website:
(http://www.nj.gov/mvc/About/safety_pedestrain.htm)

"In most cases, pedestrians have the right-of-way at all intersections.
A motorist must stop and remain stopped for a pedestrian who is crossing at a crosswalk (marked or unmarked) until the pedestrian completes his/her crossing. Motorists who fail to yield to pedestrians or who overtake and pass vehicles that are stopped for pedestrians are subject to a $100 fine and up to 15 days in jail (N.J.S.A. 39:4-36)."

So, you see... The answer is simple. DRIVERS MUST OBEY THE LAW.

Tom Vielbig

6:23 pm on Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Two suggestions: 1. Can we please make Ridgewood ave and Broad an All Way Stop? It is.clear that most drivers are confused on who has the right of way, and you really cannot see that Broad Has stop signs when approaching on Ridgewood ave. There are a TON of visitors and folks unfamiliar with the intersection - it is almost always a mess. 2. Why don't we put speed bumps along Franklin and Ridgewood ave?

Reply

Bergenbot

3:42 pm on Wednesday, November 2, 2011

This problem has existed in Ridgewood for years. As an "outsider" I can say that due to an incident that came close to what Patricia F. unfortunately experienced, I have stopped bringing my business to the CBD of Ridgewood. I have avoided dining and shopping there at all costs for the past 15 years. When my child was still in a stroller, an attractive, young 20-something who had strong Ridgewood PD connections nearly ran us down in a crosswalk. She came zooming out of nowhere while we were midway through the crosswalk. I had eye contact with her. I even called out to her to stop. She kept right on plowing and nearly hit my baby. I called the Ridgewood PD, we caught up with her in a nearby parking lot, and as soon as the officer laid eyes on her and she began bragging about which "guys on the force" she knew, nothing further was done.

I have zero confidence in the protection of pedestrians in Ridgewood. How many people will have to get hit or worse, die, on Ridgewood's streets before something is done?

Reply

Leave a comment