Legal News That You Can Use: The Medical Marijuana Melee

In 2010, our state’s fearless lawmakers passed the New Jersey Compassionate Use Medical Marijuana Act. The Act legalized the distribution of medical marijuana...

In 2010, our state’s lawmakers passed the New Jersey Compassionate Use Medical Marijuana Act. The Act legalized the distribution of medical marijuana to qualifying patients. The law provided for the establishment of six so-called “Alternative Treatment Centers."  The ATCs were to be spread evenly throughout New Jersey. The Department of Health was put in charge of overseeing the act’s implementation. The department took measures to ensure that the new system was not abused.

One such measure was a blanket prohibition on giving out licenses to for-profit companies. In order to qualify for the high honor of running an ATC, a company had to be a nonprofit. The reason for this requirement was simple. The last thing the Garden State needs is a network of glorified drug dealers posing as medical professionals.

Once the state opened its doors to applications, dozens of eager hopefuls seized the opportunity. Alas, only six lucky applicants were chosen.  The others were left high and dry. One rejected applicant, a for-profit “natural” healing company, complained. They were angry that, just because they were for-profit, they were disqualified. These natural healers challenged the regulations in court. They argued that there was a need for more ATCs in New Jersey. Besides, as Mitt Romney says, corporations are people, too! (OK, they didn’t really argue that, it just seemed to fit).

Recently, the court issued a ruling. The court’s analysis focused on a mind-numbing discussion about the meaning of the word “shall.” (Reminds me of Bill Clinton’s immortal words that “it depends what the meaning of 'is' is.” But I digress). In the end, the court predictably sided with the Health Department. The judge ruled that the Health Department’s “decision follows the law, violates no express or implied legislative policies, and has not been shown to be unreasonable.” Really, this was an easy case.

In fact, the law is written so clearly, it’s like, you have to wonder what the challengers themselves were smoking when they decided to bring this case to court.


Marc S. Berman is an attorney with offices in Fair Lawn and Paramus. You can follow him on Twitter hereDisclaimer: The articles posted here  are for informational purposes only, and are not intended as legal advice for specific cases. Readers  should not act, or refrain from acting, based upon any information presented here, but rather should retain an attorney to advise them.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

abook November 06, 2012 at 03:44 PM
well 6 dispensaries are not sufficient, what are you smoking? It's a big joke that people are suffering all over the state from cancer, and other serious diseases, and this can help them more than any other medication, big funny joke Mr. Lawyer thanks. The state could have 500 dispensaries helping people and generating job and tax revenues, and easing life for citizens, big joke.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »