Amid Boos, Applause, Planning Board OKs Valley Hospital Expansion

One person is arrested as Ridgewood police call for assistance to control the crowd.

Monday may have been the longest day of the year, but for Ridgewood Planning Board members voting on the Valley Hospital proposal, it felt like the longest night.

In a 6-1 vote, the board approved a master plan amendment to allow the Valley Hospital to double its facilities on its existing site. Outside, hundreds of people, unable to get inside, shouted and chanted throughout the meeting, several times delaying the proceedings and resulting in one arrest.

With only member, Morgan Hurley, voting against the proposal, the board approved the amendment amid loud boos and applause from those in the auditorium, which was filled to capacity with an overflow crowd outside.

"I've listened for three years to experts, [Concerned Residents of Ridgewood spokesman Paul Gould], and residents. I believe we can have a modern hospital facility," Chairman David Nicholson said before his yes vote. He called increased setbacks, buffers and other alterations to the original plan before the board justifications for his vote.

Since the board took up an amendment to increase Valley's building mass to nearly 1.2 million square feet on its 15.4-acre facility in 2006, the deliberations have dominated local politics. After two drafts, three experts and three years of hearings, the board approved the measure last night. However, it is likely to be months or even years before construction begins. Opponents could also appeal the decision in court.

Held at the hot George Washington Middle School without air conditioning, the meeting's venue became part of the story. Like most large-scale hearings, last night's meeting was originally scheduled at the bigger Benjamin Franklin Middle School across town (and next to the hospital). On Friday, board secretary Barbara Carlton announced the location change due to the upcoming Project Graduation at Benjamin Franklin.

The situation was compounded yesterday when Carlton announced parking at the adjacent West Side Presbyterian Church would not be permitted due to further scheduling conflicts. Many residents walked, carpooled or were dropped off only to find access to the meeting barred at 7 p.m. as the occupancy limit had been reached. No video simulcast option existed—as is the case for crowded Village Council meetings.

Councilman Paul Aronoshn—who will deliberate on the matter with his colleagues in the future—attended the meeting.

"The venue was wrong. It was too hot. It was too small. Despite any logistical challenges, all residents should have been permitted to participate in this important meeting either with a seat inside or via video hook up," he wrote in an e-mail.

With crowds spilling onto the street, North Monroe Street was blocked off from Godwin to West Ridgewood Avenues. 

Ridgewood police were assisted in crowd control by officers from Wyckoff, Midland Park, Glen Rock, Bergen County police and the Bergen County Sheriff's Department. Ridgewood Police Captain Thomas Landers confirmed the arrest but could not elaborate on its details.

Preceding a vote, the board first decided against seeking further study and making proposal amendments. 

After struggling to speak over the crowd noise inside and outside the auditorium, Nicholson, Mayor David Pfund, Councilman-elect Tom Riche, and board members Nancy Bigos, Charles Nalbantian and Anne Ward voted for the amendment.

Many members said expert testimony—which evolved over the three years—draft modifications, and the desire for a modern hospital facility outweighed the negatives.

Ward called the vote "an opportunity to create something special."

Bigos said, "I want what's best for all the residents, and I think superior medical care" is necessary.

Casting the only no vote, Hurley said the proposal was "far bigger than what I thought I'd vote for." He said if the hospital had worked with residents, he could have approved the plan.

The yes vote was one of the outgoing mayor's last decisions on council.

"It's a sad day in the village when we have to call the county police to come in here," Pfund said. "It's quite a divisive issue, and it has gone on long enough at this stage. I've seen many divisive issues, and when they get resolved the people get back together as a community. I hope we can get there." 

While on the board, Riche campaigned and was elected to council in May. Despite being a board member who was unable to comment publicly, Riche was endorsed by activist group the Concerned Residents of Ridgewood.

Before voting for the initiative, Riche said there would be future times for the public to weigh in. On the endorsement, Riche said he never asked for it.

"Being a board member and a candidate were two separate and distinct things. I'll continue to monitor this issue as a council member," Riche said.

Now a part of the master plan, the project needs Village Council to rewrite zoning ordinances and approve site plans and building applications before the first phase of the project can start.

Several residents left the hearing before a final vote citing frustration. Don Schwenker disagreed with Ward's decision, which referenced nursing staff who endorsed the plans.

"I'd like to add that the Planning Board's comments—that they really listened to the Valley nurses in their decision—made me sick (goes against experts, they are just paid employees, paid to say this)," he wrote in an e-mail. "I will now go to Hackensack Hospital, unless it's a life or death situation, which would mean it's not my decision to make."

Lisa Baney requested the board consider other options in her testimony, which included having the hospital look elsewhere for new facilities.

"Before, I talked to [late Councilwoman] Anne Zusy, and we wanted to have 'less space in your face,'" she said, adding that when the board ruled out that Valley should seek facilities outside of Ridgewood based on Valley's financial situation and the board's lack of jurisdiction, it missed "the big picture."

Bob McCarthy took issue with the many Valley supporters in attendance who he said weren't residents.

"The fact that Valley is here to make it seem like they have support—I can't stand it," he said.  

CRR spokesman Gould, who heard loud cheers after exiting the middle school, said the decision was not a "vindication" of the Renewal Project. 

"The vote is a direct result of the polished web of influence that Valley has spun throughout the region and the fact that the Planning Board so severely limited its scope of investigation to 'how do we make it happen...' Gould said in a written statement. "The will of the people WILL ultimately prevail, and the fight now moves on to the Village Council."

Gould also acknowledged Hurley for "being brave enough to say the truth..."

Thanking the board for its "exhaustive efforts," hospital spokesperson Megan Fraser said, "Over the past three-and-half years at more than 35 meetings, board members reviewed research, expert testimony, and the input of hundreds of residents. Their work led to a project that evolved over time... that is both responsive to our neighbors and the hospital's needs and will benefit patients of our community for generations to come."

Fraser pointed to a building removal and rebuilding project Valley undertook in the 1980s as assurance that it will work with the schools "to outline how we will plan, manage and complete construction in a safe and healthy environment."

The new Village Council—including Aronsohn, Riche, Deputy Mayor Keith Killion and Councilwoman-elect Bernadette Walsh (who attended the meeting)—will deliberate further on the issue after its new members take office July 1.

AMAMOM June 22, 2010 at 02:02 AM
Wow, i can only say "wow" after dropping my jaw in disbelief. A sad day for Ridgewood indeed.
Elaine Posner June 22, 2010 at 02:10 AM
The man arrested was on crutches... and was taken away in handcuffs. Sad day for Ridgewood, indeed!
Ze June 22, 2010 at 02:45 AM
The guy with the speech impediment probably arrested the guy on crutches! That guy sucks. I can't believe I missed this debacle. That being said, this isn't the Ridgewood I knew from 20 years ago!
Marthe Ludwig June 22, 2010 at 01:54 PM
Why was the guy on crutches arrested? I am shocked that a meeting that was supposedly based on improving the health of the community, resulted in the disrespect of a person's health disability by a representative of the town! The residents, in general, were disrespected and inconvenienced through last minute changes, lack of seating, visual or audio access to the meeting, severe lack of parking, and relief from the heat. Sounds like the epitome of poor planning. Doesn't say much for Ridgewood's PLANNING Board, does it.
Marthe Ludwig June 22, 2010 at 02:44 PM
Derek...very enlightening. I wondered if that was why the meeting place was changed...and bussed in supporters...early, while people of the community weren't allowed in?... Beijing? LOL... All of your points sound on the mark. They SHOULD be ashamed of themselves. I don't think it's over.
PLAYAC June 22, 2010 at 03:20 PM
I actually think it was a good day for Ridgewood. It shows for once that some process is not going to be compromised by the group that might speak the loudest but doesn't represent, as much as they might think, all or even the majority of Ridgewood. It also shows for once that a government group (VC or Planning Board) actually can make a decision after a thorough analysis rather than being bogged down in infinite paralysis by analysis that has affected so many other projects in this town (i.e, garages).
Lynnport June 22, 2010 at 03:55 PM
As one of the residents who had to get there at 6:15 to make sure we got in...what a sham 1. Last minute change from BF to GW - after the notice was published in the RidgewoodNews - parents had to flood the BOE inbox to request enotices to go out to parents 2. Email going out stating the church parking lot was closed and that people would be turned away! Not True: Church was contacted and it was NOT closed to those attending the meeting NOR was there anyone turning people away 3. If Oronoshn was sincere about the venue that all residents should have been able to attend - then why didn't he request all the Valley EMPLOYEES that attended give their seats to tax paying residents. (Valley started bussing people over very early and had 1/2 the room filled by 6:45 - residents had to spread out and save seats for RESIDENTS). 4. Hurley said it right - - 'far bigger'..and 'if the hospital worked with the residents'... 5. PB keeps stating most of the residents support valley...where is this stat coming from? or better yet how is the question asked? i.e. do you want a community hospital for ER visits or do you want the hospital to expand to a mega regional that current customer base comses mostly from out of ridgewood?...i bet it is the former... even look at these comments so far ONLY 1 of 9 supports valley. FACT: my husband and I knocked on 100 doors this weekend (and not in the Valley neighborhood)...only 2 people supported valley...what is that 2%?!!!! SAD
James Jr. June 22, 2010 at 04:56 PM
Disclaimer: What I heard and not necessarily the "facts" 1) Last Minute Change: Project Graduation was taking place there and to limit the disruption of their project 2 days before graduation, decision was to move. 2) Parking: Church has prior events happening there at 6pm & 6:30 pm that could have prevented limited parking. Either: 1) Their event did not require all the spots 2) Event ended prior to meeting 3) Their event was canceled 3) Public Meeting: Public meetings are open to the public, including non-residents. Although, it make sense to have "taxpayer" in the room you can not legal exclude the "public". All attendees were allowed in early. 5) What question(s) did you ask when knocking on people's doors? Not everyone wants to release their views on a heated topic in town. After last night, can you blame them?
Lynnport June 22, 2010 at 06:07 PM
1. Makes sense not to disrupt project graduation. BUT that was already on the schedule so again - last minute change on something that was already there. 2. Parking: yes church did have prior events...which was confirmed from our phone call (did you make the phone call?), the phone call confirmed that there would be space available and that it was never closed. 3. Did not say other attendees couldn't attend - commented on the statement about 'residents' being able to attend. please bullet your comment on what was said 4. Question about whether they supported the expansion. FACT: the council seat was won by the ONLY candidate that openly opposed Valley's expansion. What question was asked to say the majority of residents support valley?
Marthe Ludwig June 22, 2010 at 06:23 PM
James...regarding #3...Sounds like a legality Valley was well aware of when they arranged for the "out of towner" public to flood the room early. The whole evening sounds like a sorry imitation of a '50's Twilight Zone episode.
Marthe Ludwig June 22, 2010 at 06:51 PM
That's right! It completely slipped my mind that Project Graduation isn't even held in the Auditorium. Unbelievable...I'm ashamed of the lack of integrity shown regarding this whole issue. Just plain SNEAKY, ARROGANT and INSULTING.
James Jr. June 22, 2010 at 06:52 PM
The actually Project Grad. is held in the gym/hallway, however I am unsure if the auditorium is used for preparation or the change was to prevent multiple activities from interfering with each other. Previous Planning Board meetings have been held at GW in the past when BF was unavailable. There just seems to be a lot of theories out there this was to allow the Planning Board to "silence" residents, but if that was truly the case wouldn't they just go to their regular meeting place, Village Hall which house a fraction of GW? I think the saying, no good deed goes unpunished is valid here.
Marthe Ludwig June 22, 2010 at 07:51 PM
Maybe Village Hall wasn't big enough for all the attendees they had planned to bus in.
Lynnport June 22, 2010 at 08:03 PM
Ah James..guess what it was originally at Village Hall! Only after that was discloseed there was and an influx of emails, calls did it get changed to a larger forum. Only to get changed again.
Lynnport June 23, 2010 at 04:02 AM
one last comment here - ref: majority of Ridgewood... 1. to note: of the 8 individuals posting here 2 - for valley , 6 not. Not a majority for Valley 2. The Village Council - take note...the last election, the person who came in with the MOST VOTES...was the ONLY one who made a stance AGAINST valley in the Ridgewood News. The MAJORITY of the votes went to her... 3. Whereas James - public meetings open to 'everyone'...the Village Council open seats and elections , will be voted in by RESIDENTS, and we will note that in re-elections.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »