News Alert
VIDEO: Jersey Shore Beach Conditions And Traffic

Council Passes Controversial 'Dangerous Dog' Ordinance

Ridgewood officials also endorsed the creation of a responsible pet ownership committee, widely supported by animal groups.

Owners of dogs determined to be 'potentially dangerous' will have to cough up $700 annually for licensing costs in Ridgewood.

The village council on Wednesday unanimously agreed to increase the licensing fee from the state minimum of $150 to the maximum of $700 on an annual basis. Officials said they were prompted to act following an alleged unprovoked dog attack in December.

Although there are roughly 50 dog bite incidents investigated by the Ridgewood Health Department per year, it's extremely rare that a dog is designated "potentially dangerous." No dog had been officially labeled potentially dangerous in nearly a decade, according to village officials.

"The expectation and hope is we won't have to use it," Mayor Paul Aronsohn said, referring to the ordinance passed Wednesday.

Procedurally, a dog is determined to be potentially dangerous by a New Jersey municipal court, and in the majority of cases, the dog has a history of bites or unprovoked attacks.

Once a dog is declared potentially dangerous, the health department must make monthly visits to ensure the animal is being properly monitored. Determination is made by dog, not based on breed. Once the declaration is made, it cannot be reversed. A potentially dangerous dog is branded one for life in New Jersey.

Legally, the $700 fee can only be applied to administrative costs and not site visits or investigations. Canine groups have spoken out against the increased fee, which is based on state statute. They contend the fees do not address the issues.

So while the ordinance itself drew headlines, a flurry of dog groups pledged support for an educational committee on pet ownership Wednesday night, to be headed by Jeffrey Ball.

Ball, a Ridgewood resident and the current president of the NJ Federation of Dog Clubs, said many dangers are preventable with proper education.

"Too often now people go on the Internet, buy dogs and put themselves in situations where they don't know how to deal with it," Ball said. "Dogs can then become dangerous."

There was a reported dog biting three weeks ago, where owners attempted to break up a fight between their scrapping dogs. They suffered minor cuts to hands and arms, police said.

"That would have been prevented, and simple education does that," Ball remarked.

"With drunk driving, drugs, don't we educate the public on things not to do? It's the same thing that needs to be done here. So I put a proposal to the mayor, to the council, to start a responsible pet ownership committee here in town."

The committee, he hopes, will draw participation from village residents, officials and citizens from nearby towns. The American Kennel Club will supply materials without cost to Ridgewood, Ball said. Residents and the council have supported the idea of a committee.

The committee will address issues affecting owners of other animals, like cats, birds and rabbits.

Several dog trainers, representatives from local shelters, and kennel club members told the council they would offer their expertise and time free of charge when the committee gets off the ground.

Phil Ross February 17, 2013 at 03:19 AM
So - the $700 fee is dog specific, not breed specific? That's not how the law is being popularized or presented.
Phil Ross February 17, 2013 at 03:23 AM
There are plenty of programs available at shelters, pet stores and online for concerned pet owners. The gov't doesn't need to be involved. This will ultimately wind up costing the taxpayer more. A colossal waste and another gov't agency sucking money out of the wallets of the taxpayer. Well thought out!
longtimer66 February 17, 2013 at 03:24 PM
If you saw the meeting video, the education part is being given for free via other groups. I don't see a problem with the Village publicizing those or helping give people access to them, am I missing something? The money part is to cover what it costs the Village to comply with the mandatory State regs- though I don't know how the figure was determined. To me it's more like if your dog requires such inspections and monitoring per State regs which the Village didn't make, then you have to pay for that rather than everyone else having to pay the cost. But that would only apply if a judge-- after a process- determined your animal was subject to those State-made requirements.
Mike Kupchik February 17, 2013 at 11:25 PM
Based on some of the regulations heaped on an innocent populace by all those in power, we should require financial bonding for the latter, or make sure no immunity exists from any personal lawsuits that could result, making them think twice before any rush to judgements! Sounds like just another episode of masked town-greed to me.
Gina Marie February 18, 2013 at 11:22 AM
This is a ridiculous ordinance! Who exactly deems a dog dangerous? More $$$ for Ridgewood!


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »