State Senate OKs Pension and Health Care Reform Bill

Bill that increases contributions is approved by NJ Senate by margin on 24-1

The New Jersey State Senate approved a bill aimed at increasing contributions to health benefits and pension payments for public employees today by a margin of 24-15.  The State Assembly still needs to pass its own bill before the law will go to the governor's desk for signing.

The bill makes various changes to the manner in which the Teachers’ Pension and Annuity Fund (TPAF), the Judicial Retirement System (JRS), the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS), the Police and Firemen’s Retirement System (PFRS), and the State Police Retirement System (SPRS) operates and to the benefit provisions of those systems, according to a release from the Senate.

Gov. Chris Christie released a statement commending the passage of Bill S-2937.

“I am encouraged by the bi-partisan Senate vote today and the continued display of support for common-sense pension and health benefits reform," Gov. Christie said via release. "This is a watershed moment for New Jersey, proving that the stakes are too high and the consequences all too real to stand by and do nothing. As a result of Democrats and Republicans coming together to confront the tough issues, we are providing a sustainable future for our pension and health benefit system, saving New Jersey taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars and securing a fiscally responsible future for our state.”

Unions representing teachers and other public employees have been rallying supporters in Trenton for several days to oppose the measure, which now goes to the state Assembly, where passage seems likely. The legislation has been a top priority for Gov Chris Christie and Senate Majority Leader Steve Sweeney (D-Gloucester).

The bill provides for increases in the employee contribution rates:

from 5.5 percent to 6.5 percent, plus an additional 1 percent phased-in over seven years beginning in the first year, meaning after 12 months, after the bill’s effective date for TPAF and PERS (including legislators, Law Enforcement Officer (LEO) members, and workers compensation judges); from 3 percent to 12 percent for JRS phased-in over seven years; from 8.5 percent to 10 percent for PFRS members and members of PERS Prosecutors Part; and from 7.5 percent to 9 percent for SPRS members, according to the bill.

The bill also repeals earlier legislation that provides a member of PERS or PFRS the ability to retire while holding an elective public office covered by PERS or PFRS, while continuing to receive the full salary for that office.

The bill states that the automatic cost-of-living adjustment will no longer be provided to current and future retirees and beneficiaries.

As for health benefits reform, the bill requires all public employees and certain public retirees to contribute toward the cost of health care benefits coverage based upon a percentage of the cost of coverage. Under the bill, all active public employees will pay a percentage of the cost of health care benefits coverage for themselves and any dependents, according to the Senate release. Lower compensated employees will pay a smaller percentage and more highly compensated employees will pay a higher percentage. The rates will gradually increase based on an employee’s compensation, at intervals of $5,000. 

Click here for more information on Senate bill S-2937.

SK June 21, 2011 at 11:52 AM
I congradulate the governor and all the state senators that have finally started considering the needs of all taxpayers of New Jersey. They have started showing some common and fiscal sense. Now lets see if future policiticians can show the same backbone.
frank June 22, 2011 at 12:37 AM
Well he is consistent... he seems to not like anything related to the public education sector. (personal opinion, please note). However, will this change effect my taxes in any way? No. These education cuts are meant to cover the budget. It will not effect how much we pay in taxes. So does it consider my immediate needs? Not really. I want the best (public) education for my kids. In Ridgewood these current cuts may not matter, but if I was in a different school system, I would wonder what the cumulative effects of all these cuts would be on the quality of the kid's education. A recent Quinnipiac Poll had this to say about Christie's handling of education in NJ: (from...) http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1299.xml?ReleaseID=1615 Looking at public school funding, New Jersey voters say: 56 - 40 percent support more tax dollars for schools in the state's poorest districts; 62 - 36 percent support more funding to improve all schools; 49 - 45 percent say the State Supreme Court was right to order increased spending for the state's poorest schools; 74 - 18 percent say cut state spending rather than raise taxes to pay more for schools; 65 - 29 percent support a millionaire's tax to fund schools. I think he really is at his limit now of what he can cut in regards to education and schools.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »