patching...
Breaking: Sopranos Star James Gandolfini Dead at 51 »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Dangerous Dog

Thursday, February 14, 2013

Council Passes Controversial 'Dangerous Dog' Ordinance

Ridgewood officials also endorsed the creation of a responsible pet ownership committee, widely supported by animal groups.

Owners of dogs determined to be 'potentially dangerous' will have to cough up $700 annually for licensing costs in Ridgewood. The village council on Wednesday unanimously agreed to increase the licensing fee from the state minimum of $150 to the maximum of $700 on an annual basis. Officials said they were prompted to act following an alleged unprovoked dog attack in December. Although there are roughly 50 dog bite incidents investigated by the Ridgewood Health Department per year, it's extremely rare that a dog is designated "potentially dangerous." No dog had been officially labeled potentially dangerous in nearly a decade, according to village officials. "The expectation and hope is we won't have to use it," Mayor Paul Aronsohn said, …

Gina Mastrogiovanni

11:34 am on Monday, February 18, 2013

This is a ridiculous ordinance! Who exactly deems a dog dangerous? More $$$ for Ridgewood!   more ›

Thursday, January 31, 2013

Dog Federation Prez Says $700 'Dangerous' Dog Licensing Fee Won't Work

Ridgewood's reasons to significantly increase a dog licensing fee are faulty, a resident and dog club president argued. The village has maintained it's concerned about the time and cost spent monitoring 'dangerous' dogs.

A Ridgewood resident and president of the state's federated canine club says the village's effort to increase licensing fees onto owners of 'dangerous dogs' will not solve the problems it faces. Addressing the council Wednesday night, Jeffrey Ball said the council's proposed ordinance to increase licensing fees of court-designated "dangerous dogs" to $700 misses the mark on several fronts. "A true dangerous dog is a problem and needs to be dealt with in an appropriate way," Ball, the current president of the NJ Federation of Dog Clubs, said. "Just raising the licensing fee is not the answer." According to Ball, a long-time resident, Ridgewood's belief that shifting the financial burden of monitoring a 'dangerous' dog onto the owner isn't …

Cheryl Matthews

12:30 pm on Friday, February 8, 2013

I am offended not only by this legislation but also by the picture of the dog used in conjunction with this article. If there were legislation pending that would require persons of a specific race to pay an extra $10,000 per year to the town in order to live there, a fee based solely on their race and the stereotypes regarding that race as being more prone to violent crime... Would that be …   more ›

Got a Hot Tip?
 
 

Videos