Ridgewood BOE Opposes Superintendent Salary Caps, Will Push State for Change
The Ridgewood school board will draft a resolution pushing for new lobbying efforts in Trenton to overturn superintendent salary caps in place since 2010.
With its hands tied by state regulations, the Ridgewood Board of Education will draft a resolution to lobby for changes in the state salary cap that will either force current superintendent Daniel Fishbein to take a substantial pay cut, or restrict the board in negotiations with other candidates when his contract expires this summer.
Board member Michele Lenhard, who proposed and will draft the resolution, said it is intended “to encourage school boards to look further at this issue and advocate on behalf of boards of education, from the standpoint that salary caps definitely impact the boards' ability to seek the best candidate for the superintendent position.”
If the Ridgewood school board approves the language of the draft, it will be submitted for approval to the NJ School Boards Association, a federation of the state’s school boards that advocates on their behalf. A resolution submitted by March would go before their resolution subcommittee and could be voted on by the spring delegate assembly.
If successful in the process, the resolution would make opposition to the salary cap a priority for school boards lobbyists in their trips to the state legislature.
The cap, which was put in place by the state commissioner of education without action by the legislature, caps superintendent salaries based on the size of the district. The regulation expires in November 2014, but board members’ concern is that, unless overturned by the legislature, it could be extended further—and indefinitely tie their hands in future contract negotiations.
Superintendent Fishbein’s current salary of $227,000 already exceeds the current cap of $165,000 for a district of Ridgewood’s size. Should he renew his contract, as he has indicated he would, he will be forced to take a pay cut amounting to the difference.
And once an official reaches the cap, Lenhard pointed out, they begin “going backwards” as healthcare contributions rise, with no wiggle room for cost of living adjustments.
Board members agreed to move forward on a draft, citing other boards’ difficulties in recruiting new candidates and a 30 percent turnover rate among New Jersey superintendents as reasons for their support. Lenhard hopes to present the final language at their next meeting.
Board President Sheila Brogan pointed out an absence of support for similar resolutions when the regulation was adopted in 2010, but hopes that statistics collected since will help a new push for action at the state level.
“Three years later hopefully there will be a change in tune, when people see how much turnover there’s been and that we are losing experienced superintendents to surrounding states,” Brogan said.
Donald Henke
11:06 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
If the love for their their job and $165,000 isn't enough, then let them go. Other states will follow our lead.
maureen
11:06 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
There is ABSOLUTELY no reason a superintendent with assistants and principals should be making more than the Governor of New Jersey .
Tell him to spend less time writing those long-winded letters on how to deal with our own children . I think we can figure that out on our own.
Enough is enough !
Boyd A. Loving
11:06 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
I strongly oppose the use of any tax dollars in connection with efforts to overturn the salary cap.
No taxpayer supported BOE administrative personnel resources, nor equipment (phone, copiers, paper, etc.), should be utilized in this endeavor.
Dave in 'Wood
11:06 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
I'm not necessarily advocating for a higher salary for our Super, but I do think it should be a local decision as opposed to a mandate from Trenton. Let them worry about managing the districts they control (Camden, Newark, Paterson, etc) and let us worry about our own district. For all our (minor) flaws, I think we can all agree that we are in much better shape than the inner city districts.
Good for the BOE! I wish them luck.
RB
11:19 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
Dr Fishbein has done a tremendous job running our school system. He deserves every penny.
Boyd A. Loving
12:12 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
So long as it's not more than $165k.
thetentman
12:12 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
First off Dan is the Man. He has done a wonderful job. Gov Christie does not have the qualifications to be a school Superintendent. And last I looked the Football coach at Rutgers gets paid way more than Chris Christie.
Rock
12:12 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Part of the issue is that the Superintendant salary cap was done without any context for the rest of the education compensation levels.
For example, Ridgewoods HS principal makes $176k, and the various elementary school principals make in the 150-163k range.
For these principals, what do they aspire to do next in their careers? Given the cap, if it were me, I would aspire to go elsewhere - meaning out of state, or in the same field but external to the imposed compensation caps.
Or, they could aspire to be the principal at North Bergen, who makes $228k.
(all of this info is publicly available)
Carl C
12:12 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Really, 165 isnt enough? i want my superintendent to hold that position because he or she is passionate about educating our youth, not someone who wants the position to become a millionaire.
Moist Cake
5:52 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Ass, Cash or Grass NOTHING Is For Free, No person will do this job because it gives just gratification.
I highly suggest if you want your town to continue to be amongst the best in public education, you pay the person running it top dollar just like in the "private" sector.
Otherwise watch your schools drop and your property values drop even further while taxes will never go down.
News Man
12:12 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Views by the BOE should 'not be limited in any form' that they feel is appropriate. That's their job. They are the ones elected to do so.
Any attempt to do so done by individuals should be communicated only to their individual BOE member in detail. Or at a public meeting.
Brian
12:12 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
I would rather see the board pursue options for alternative compensation as opposed to spending money on lawyers to fight this policy. Perhaps a housing allowance, additional 401k contributions, a company car, etc. might be able to make up the gap. It is hard to fight city hall even when you are city hall.
News Man
12:12 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
PS: the limitation was done by the Governor not the legislature.
jp1
12:29 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Largest system in bergen county i would think deserves the pay.
RB
12:56 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Absolutely jp1. The superintendent of schools is the CEO of the system and deserves the pay. You have to live in lala land if you think $165k is enough.
The Stig
2:40 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
He would also be eligible for additional money because the district has a HS, and, a bonus equal to 15% of his salary, or $25K, so the pay cut isn't as dramatic as the BOE portrays.
Robert Patterson
2:40 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Ridgewood has a long history of hiring great people that are topping off their careers.
Same time Ridgewood passes up super people climbing up in their career in Ridgewood, who after being rejected, leave the system.
At last the State Cap should make the RBOE rethink and hire a super young energized person who will give them the usual 5 years before they move on.
BP
Gary J Negrycz
2:40 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
A living wage is a good thing but to run a business the size of Ridgewoods School system with the Benefits that go with it does not require a Quarter of a million dollar a year employee
barbara
5:43 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Is that the most important item on their agenda that the BOE has to think about??? Well, perhaps the BOE should fix the descending national test score results that has been happening in Ridgewood and find out why our very highly compensated school administrators haven't fixed the descending scores and worry less about salary caps.
Paul
2:32 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Hey Superintendant Daniel Fishbein, If you cannot afford to live in N.J. Move out and take
the THREE TRANSFORMERS that you had installed one foot from my driveway with you!
You know the ones that lght up the Astro Turf fields in the Flood Zone that have caused all
the Ridgewood tax payers So much Money. P.S. Hey superintendant were did the money
to pay for all of those Giant Stadium lights and electricty come from? Property Taxes!!
Joe
9:29 am on Friday, January 18, 2013
Are you still here? Still not making any sense, I see. GET OVER IT.
RB
5:35 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Paul: The word is superintendent. Also, it's "where did the money to..." NOT WERE.
Paul
6:39 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
RB, So upset that you did not read what I had to say. But thats O.C. oh I mean thats O.K.
Where did the money come from? Property Taxes??
barbara
12:00 am on Friday, January 18, 2013
The real estate agents are happy to hear this news. More people running for their financial lives and leaving town means more houses for sale.
Bill Connor
2:25 pm on Wednesday, June 5, 2013
the only Irony here is that Negative Salary movements force a Gut check on how high our Property taxes really are..great Town et al...Seems alot of effort was made on the Tax summary Mailer detailing how tough the cuts were -meanwhile the Police Salary increases were extreme for such a small Town.Mandated under contract etc etc.