.

Hospital Expansion Foes Endorse Killion, Aronsohn and Shinozuka for Council

No candidate with the blessing of Concerned Residents of Ridgewood (CRR) has lost an election.

Three candidates just received what could be a big boost to their election hopes Monday with the endorsement of Concerned Residents of Ridgewood (CRR), a grassroots group wary of Valley Hospital’s expansion aims.

According to a statement released Monday night, the organization has endorsed incumbents Mayor Keith Killion, Councilman Paul Aronsohn and newcomer candidate .

“Voters must go to the polls on May 8th, and vote for candidates Killion, Shinozuka and Aronsohn, who are the only candidates to consistently, publicly say that ‘Renewal’, as proposed and approved by the Planning Board, was wrong for Ridgewood,” said Pete McKenna, .

According to McKenna, the decision to endorse the trio was made after the group conducted interviews on a range of topics with the candidates. The list included taxation, the state of the business district, land-use development, Graydon Pool and other hot-button issues, the group said in the statement.

“To those who think we are one-issue people, ask the candidates how well prepared we were on all of these topics,” McKenna said. “While our primary concern as CRR is the balancing of resident needs against Valley’s desires, we are Ridgewood taxpayers and residents too and would only endorse candidates we feel will serve Ridgewood well for years to come.”

Sitting incumbents Killion and Aronsohn didn’t shy away from voicing concerns with Valley’s latest expansion effort, . Both were part of the that would have allowed for a 100 percent expansion of the facility on Van Dien and Linwood Ave. proponents of the plan have said is critically needed given the challenges in health care. 

The grassroots group credited Killion with effectively running the "H-Zone" hearings over the fall, a stark contrast to those of the planning board the year prior.

“This contribution during Mayor Killion’s current tenure is a vital legacy of the current Council," McKenna stated. Aronsohn, the group said, asked "pointed and critical questions of the experts,” a factor in the decision.

Similarly, Shinozuka has repeatedly stated she has had concerns with the size and scale of the project during her campaign. CRR said her opposition to the large expansion, as well as experience on the planning board were key reasons she was endorsed.

Shinozuka was appointed to the governing body after it , effectively kicking the hospital’s $750 million proposal .

Though no new plans have emerged since the , because the planning board master plan amendment remains on the books, a future council could pick up the pieces and reverse the decision.

Aronsohn has publicly called for the planning board to rescind the measure it passed last year. However, sources said the planning board would prefer to wrap up its and has made no movement to rescind the amendment to the master plan. 

Recent history shows those endorsed by CRR have a clear edge in elections. No candidate – – have suffered a defeat at the polls with an endorsement from the CRR.

The group says that's not necessarily a good thing.

“Ridgewood voters have elected every candidate that has been endorsed by CRR, but nothing would please us more than to be irrelevant in future elections," McKenna said, adding it's the group's “sincere hope" this is the last election Valley's "business desires" are put to a voting test. 

The other council candidates were unlikely to pick up an endorsement given their positions on the issue, or in the case of , his lack of a stated position. Pucciarelli, the planning board vice chair, has recused himself from the Valley hearings and said he’d do the same should he be elected to the council. 

, active with the Valley Hospital Auxiliary, has been outspoken about her hope to see a different look for Valley’s aging plant in Ridgewood.

, who lives on nearby Emmett Place, too has said Valley needs a major modern overhaul and he would support such a change.

Elections take place May 8. Three seats are up for grabs, each with a term of four years.

Dan Gergoslow April 24, 2012 at 04:38 PM
So if I'm reading you correctly, you'll vote for the two definite "no" votes and someone other than Aronsohn's because you don't trust his "no" vote? Given that you are posting further down about the Cinema advertising, it appears to me that this as much about your opposition to Aronsohn as it is about your opposition to Valley expansion. In fact, your opposition to Aronsohn seems be more important to you than stopping the Valley expansion because six candidates are running, two are strong opponents to expansion, Aronsohn has voted against expansion in the past and has the CRR endorsement and the rest are either pro-expansion or are not being forthright about their intentions. Are you willing to vote for a "yes" vote to keep Aronsohn off the Council?
About the town April 24, 2012 at 04:41 PM
There is one "umbrella" issue: what happens to our town. It is already changing, but how much and how fast? As residents, do we want a gigantic hospital in a hospital zone? Do we want one, two, or even three enormous new apartment buildings downtown, where people are already being hit by cars incredibly often, but whose would-be builders keep saying the tenants "wouldn't need a car" because they'd be near the train or bus? Do we want Graydon maintained properly as a beautiful municipal amenity enjoyed for many generations, and for people (including Aronsohn) to stop trying to mess it up purportedly to make money for the town (after paying off a multi-million-dollar bond) or for personal glory? It's more about an attitude and an understanding than a single issue. Admittedly, that can be hard to figure out. The voter's job is not a simple one. Maybe that's why so many people fail to vote; turnout is often pathetically low--in last week's BOE/budget election, only 16.3%! And that's a percentage of REGISTERED voters. Shockingly, one of the main reasons many "candidates' petitions" (allowing them to run in the first place) are rejected at Village Hall is that the signer has never registered at all. It's frankly easier to vote on a single issue. The proposed hospital expansion became significant enough to sway many votes for several elections. As CRR hopes, it needs to go away, but Valley's heels are in the sand.
Relgado April 24, 2012 at 08:27 PM
You ask the candidate a question after her own post celebrating her CRR endorsement and her celebration post gets deleted! This morning a post that started "I've admired CRR from the beginning for their definition ..." was here. I posed a simple question (public record and easily provable information so be careful with your answer) and her post is magically deleted!!! Just go here: http://ridgewood.patch.com/users/jane-shinozuka to see at least part of it.
News Man April 24, 2012 at 08:53 PM
Thank you Roberta Sonenfeld for your views expressed here. Lumping a blanket support as expressed here by the editor of the Patch topic here and the negative editors of Blog sites is inappropiate also. Readers can think for themselves when they review the history of a candidate's history in the Village.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »